Wastewater treatment plant for integrated textile industry
Effective Wastewater Treatment Plant for an Integrated Textile Industry in India
Introduction:

The Integrated Textile Industry is a leading cloth manufacturing company that involves denim production, cotton apparel manufacturing, and is also involved in the pulping of raw materials and paper manufacturing. With a strong commitment to environmental sustainability, the Integrated Textile Industry operates a waste water treatment plant (WWTP) at its textile manufacturing facility to treat the industrial effluent generated during its textile production processes.

However, the industry faced challenges in meeting the effluent discharge limits for certain pollutants, including the presence of components from reactive dyes, high chemical oxygen demand (COD), elevated biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), higher levels of color, and effluent temperature reaching up to 50°C. To address these challenges, the industry implemented a bioaugmentation program at its effluent treatment plant (ETP), which resulted in significant improvements in the wastewater treatment process and compliance with regulatory standards for industrial effluents.

Effluent Treatment Plant (ETP) Details:

The industry had primary treatment, biological treatment, and then a tertiary treatment.

Flow500-600 KLD
Type of processMBBR
No. of aeration tanks2 (in parallel)
Capacity of aeration tanks650 KL each
Total RT hours
Challenges:
ParametersInlet parameters Outlet parameters (Secondary System)
COD13,000 to 10000 8500 to 6800 
BOD4000 to 25002800 to 1650
Colour750 to 900 Hazen560 to 700 Hazen
  • The primary treatment system was working at 20-30% efficiency in terms of COD reduction.
  • The biological treatment was working at an average of 10-15% efficiency combined in terms of COD removal.
  • The system was struggling to effectively treat pollutants originating from reactive dyes and to reduce color contamination in the textile effluent.
  • The mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) were very low, and the microbial population in the biological treatment tanks could not develop due to the high wastewater temperature of 50°C.
  • The conventional MBBR waste water treatment plant was not efficient enough to consistently meet the stringent effluent discharge standards set by local environmental regulatory agencies.

As a result, the textile manufacturing company faced the risk of non-compliance, which could lead to regulatory fines, reputational damage, and environmental pollution.

The Bioaugmentation Approach:

The Integrated Textile Industry partnered with us to enhance the efficiency of their biological units. They had two aeration tanks in parallel, equipped with diffusers, handling a daily wastewater flow of 500-600 KLD.

Bioaugmentation is a biological wastewater treatment technique that involves adding specifically selected microorganisms, such as bacteria and enzymes, to improve the biological degradation of pollutants in a waste water treatment plant. The team conducted a comprehensive wastewater assessment to analyze the industrial effluent characteristics and the WWTP’s operational parameters, identifying the best bioaugmentation strategy for this textile effluent treatment plant.

Based on the assessment, a customized bioaugmentation program was designed and implemented. The microbial cultures were carefully selected to target organic pollutants, particularly contaminants from reactive dyes in the industrial effluent stream. Thermophilic bacteria were introduced to withstand high-temperature wastewater conditions and enhance the biological treatment process.

The bioaugmentation process was seamlessly integrated into the existing wastewater treatment process, and the performance of the WWTP was monitored over the next three months.

Improved Effluent Quality After Bioaugmentation:

Parameters

Inlet Parameters (ppm)

Outlet Parameters (After Bioaugmentation) (ppm)

COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand)13,000 to 10,0002,500 to 1,800
BOD (Biochemical Oxygen Demand)4,000 to 2,500800 to 650
Color (Hazen Units)750 to 900150 to 300
Results and Benefits of Bioaugmentation in Wastewater Treatment:

The implementation of the bioaugmentation program resulted in significant improvements in the performance of biological units at the wastewater treatment plant:

✅ Achieved around 80-84% reduction in COD & BOD levels in the treated industrial effluent.
✅ Attained 80-85% color removal efficiency, demonstrating visible improvement in effluent clarity.
✅ Enhanced microbial population growth in biological tanks, even at higher wastewater temperatures.
✅ The biological treatment system became more stable, reducing process fluctuations caused by influents variability.
✅ Increased plant reliability, ensuring consistent compliance with regulatory discharge limits.
✅ Reduced operational costs through optimized biological treatment efficiency.

The successful bioaugmentation application has helped the Integrated Textile Industry maintain regulatory compliance, improve wastewater treatment plant performance, and support their commitment to sustainable textile manufacturing.

🔹 Discover More on YouTube – Watch our latest insights & innovations!

🔹 Connect with Us on LinkedIn – Stay updated with expert content & trends!

Chemical Industry Effluent Treatment with T1B Aerobio Bioculture
Introduction:

Effluent treatment is an essential process for the chemical manufacturing industry as it is a significant source of industrial wastewater pollution. Chemical industries produce a wide range of chemicals, and the effluent wastewater from these industries can contain a variety of pollutants that need to be treated before discharge into the environment. Biological wastewater treatment of effluent with bioculture for wastewater treatment is an effective and eco-friendly method for treating industrial effluent from the chemical sector.

A chemical processing industry located at Amaravati MIDC industrial area was perturbed by surging Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), and Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) levels. Our client had an activated sludge process (ASP) wastewater treatment plant, which had 4 aeration tanks in series. The industrial effluent contained high levels of chemical pollutants such as phenol, formaldehyde, ammonia, and heavy metals like lead, cadmium, and chromium. The industry used microbial culture for effluent treatment to reduce effluent parameters. However, it was incompetent at treating wastewater discharge, which could not meet the Pollution Control Board (PCB) wastewater treatment guidelines.

The initial approach: After a complete study of the effluent treatment plant (ETP) through a questionnaire, an on-site effluent assessment, and discussions with the EHS (Environmental Health & Safety) team, our experts identified numerous challenges to be addressed:

Main Issues:
  • High COD levels in wastewater
  • High BOD levels in wastewater
  • High Total Ammoniacal Nitrogen (TAN) in effluent
Effluent Treatability Study:

Before planning a wastewater treatment scheme, it is crucial to perform an industrial wastewater treatability study to understand the characteristics of industrial effluent and devise an appropriate biological wastewater treatment regime specific to the chemical industry wastewater. Team One Biotech provided the sample for a pilot-scale wastewater treatment trial, which is a laboratory-scale effluent treatment study that confirms the suitability of the bacterial consortium for wastewater treatment present in our product and its development in the effluent stream. These trials were specifically designed to provide a clear indication of whether the microbial solution for wastewater treatment can grow in a given type of effluent without compromising the pollutant reduction efficiency.

Microscopic analysis reports of the sample revealed satisfactory bacterial growth in industrial effluent. Understanding and developing methodologies for the treatment of chemical industry wastewater is necessary due to the scarcity of freshwater resources. The four main constituents in pharmaceutical plant wastewater treatment that regulators are generally concerned with are Total Organic Carbon (TOC), Total Nitrogen (TN), Total Phosphorus (TP), and Total Suspended Solids (TSS).

Treatment Regime Using T1B Aerobio:
T1B Aerobio: A Complete Solution for Industrial Wastewater Treatment

Our team of researchers developed this unique biotech formulation for effluent treatment, T1B Aerobio, which has proven to be extremely beneficial in solving the most challenging industrial wastewater treatment problems over the years. T1B Aerobio is a microbial consortium for wastewater treatment, isolated from nature. The microbes secrete effective biodegrading enzymes, which are completely natural and safe for humans, plants, and animals. These microbes are highly efficient in degrading organic pollutants in wastewater, refractory wastewater contaminants, and toxic industrial effluents even under high TDS levels.

Our team of experts planned to move ahead strategically for maintaining transparency in effluent treatment implementation between us and the industry. Initially, there was a laboratory-scale study, followed by a pilot plant study to build the client’s confidence in our biological wastewater treatment technology. Finally, the treatment was implemented on the actual industrial wastewater treatment plant (WWTP).

Execution:
Plant Optimization:

Team One Biotech recommended some changes in the effluent treatment plant design for the smooth functioning of the biological treatment process.

Initial Dosing Plan:

We planned a 60-day dosing schedule with a higher microbial culture dosing in the first month and a maintenance dose in the second month.

Observation:

We observed that after adding T1B Aerobio, it significantly reduced the COD in industrial wastewater, BOD in chemical effluent, and TAN levels in wastewater. The table below shows the reduction:

Day 1Day 15Day 30 Day 45 Day 60
COD ppm250001408480152045243
BOD ppm1000040492510804110
TAN ppm4503581909844
Results:

We observed:

  • 99% reduction in COD levels
  • 99% reduction in BOD levels
  • 90% reduction in TAN levels
  • Achieved the desired Mixed Liquor Volatile Suspended Solids (MLVSS): Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids (MLSS) ratio of 0.7
  • Maintained the required Food to Microorganism (F/M) ratio
  • Improved overall effluent treatment plant efficiency
Conclusion:

The use of T1B Aerobio for industrial wastewater treatment in the chemical manufacturing sector proved to be an effective and eco-friendly method. The efficiency of the effluent treatment plant (ETP) improved significantly, stabilizing the biological wastewater treatment process quickly. The treated effluent successfully met the Pollution Control Board (PCB) compliance standards for wastewater discharge norms.

🔹 Discover More on YouTube – Watch our latest insights & innovations!

🔹 Connect with Us on LinkedIn – Stay updated with expert content & trends!

Commisioning of ETP of a petrochemical industry
Restart and Commissioning of ETP of a Petrochemical Industry
Introduction: 

This petrochemical industry in West Bengal has a full-fledged Activated Sludge Process (ASP) system with two aeration tanks in parallel. This Effluent Treatment Plant (ETP) experienced shock loads and frequent upsets due to multiple streams and high Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) in the effluent. Maintenance of a good biomass in the aeration tanks along with sustainability in shock loads was a challenge as the upsets were highly shock-inducing.

ETP Details:

The industry had primary treatment, biological treatment, and then a tertiary treatment.

Previous Capacity
Flow (current)450 KLD
Flow (design)450 KLD
Type of processASP (parallel tanks)
Capacity of AT-1350 KL
Capacity of AT-2350 KL
Retention Time37.33 hours(combined)
Challenges: 
Parameters (PPM)Avg. Inlet parameters Avg. Outlet parameters (MBR Outlet)
COD4000-80003200-6000
BOD2600-58001200-3800
TDS70001000
PAH14501000
Operational Challenges:
  • The primary treatment was working at 5% efficiency in terms of COD reduction.
  • The biological treatment worked at an average 20-25% efficiency in terms of COD reduction.
  • They were struggling to control the higher PAH levels, and it was inducing shock loads, as explained earlier.
The Approach:

The industry partnered with us to commission their Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) and Aeration Tank with increased capacity and restart the ETP at its full capacity in terms of hydraulic load.

We adopted a 3D approach that included:

Research/Scrutiny:

Our team visited their facility to go through the process of the new Effluent Treatment Plant (ETP) and to scrutinize the value-addition factors.

Analysis:

We analyzed the 3-month cumulative data of their ETP to see trends in the inlet-outlet parameters’ variations and the permutation combinations related to it.

Innovation:

After the research and analysis, our team curated customized products and their dosing schedules with formulation, keeping in mind the plan of action to get the desired results.

This process is called bioaugmentation.

Desired Outcomes:
  • Development of strong biology to withstand shock loads and prevent upsets.
  • Making ETP more efficient regarding COD/BOD and PAH degradation.
  • Reduction in FOG (Fats, Oils, and Grease).
Execution:

Our team selected the product:

For Aeration Tank:
  1. T1B Aerobio: consists of blends of several strains of aerobic and facultative microorganisms, usually bacteria, along with key trace elements on a complex inert media.
For Oil/Grease Trap:

2. T1B FOG BioBloc:

  

Our plan of action included:
  • The addition of T1B Aerobio was also done every day with a reduction in the dosing every 10 days.
  • A total of 150 kgs of T1B Aerobio was used for 60 days of treatment.
  • T1B FOG BioBloc was placed at the O/G trap for FOG reduction.
  • 4 blocks of T1B FOG BioBloc were used for 60 days.
Results:
Parameters
Parameters (PPM)Avg. Inlet parameters Avg. Outlet parameters (secondary clarifier outlet)
COD4000-80001200-2300
BOD2600-5800500-850
TDS70001000
PAH1450321

The implementation of the bioaugmentation program resulted in significant improvements in the performance of biological units in their Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP):

  • The COD/BOD degrading efficiency increased from 20% to 70% in the biological system.
  • PAH was also getting degraded up to 77%.
  • MLSS (Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids): MLVSS (Mixed Liquor Volatile Suspended Solids) ratio was optimized.
  • Biomass in the ASP system displayed great stability even during shock load situations.

This sustainable wastewater treatment approach has helped the industry optimize effluent quality, enhance microbial community stability, and ensure compliance with environmental standards.

🔹 Discover More on YouTube – Watch our latest insights & innovations!

🔹 Connect with Us on LinkedIn – Stay updated with expert content & trends!

Saving operational expenses for pharma business using bioremediation
Saving OPEX for a reputed Pharma Giant using Bioremediation
Introduction: 

The reputed pharmaceutical giant is known for contributing to the global pharmaceutical sector by using  bioremediation. This unit is one of the largest Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) producers that manufactures products such as Tamsulosin, Metformin, Esomeprazole, etc. The Unit has a full-fledged Effluent Treatment Plant (ETP) which is a traditional Activated Sludge Process (ASP) system. The unit is committed to treating its industrial wastewater religiously. The unit had an Multi-Effect Evaporator (MEE) installed to treat high COD wastewater stream. Due to the production of multiple pharmaceutical products, the ETP received multiple effluent streams with tough-to-degrade pollutants like toluene, benzene, Metformin, Acetic Acid, Methanol, etc. Due to such high-strength wastewater streams, it was difficult for them to control ETP operations, using bioremediation which led to heavier expenses, specifically on the MEE operation, as it was receiving a heavier load than its designed capacity.

ETP details:

The industry had primary treatment, biological treatment, and then a tertiary treatment.

Flow (current)450 KLD
Flow (design)500 KLD
Type of processASP
No. of aeration tanks3 (in series)
Capacity of aeration tanks500 KL, 450 KL, 300 KL  respectively
Retention Time67 hours(combined)
MEE Details:
Capacity (current)12 KLD
Current inflow10 KLD
Inlet COD150000 ppm
Inlet TDS60000 ppm
Challenges:
Parameters (PPM)Avg. Inlet parameters Avg. Outlet parameters 
COD180009900
BOD50003000
TDS150009500
Operational Challenges:
  • The primary treatment system was working at 5% efficiency in terms of COD reduction.
  • The biological treatment system was working at an average 45% efficiency in terms of COD reduction.
  • They were struggling to effectively treat recalcitrant pollutants such as toluene, benzene, Metformin, Acetic Acid, and Methanol, which compelled them to run the ETP at 10% less hydraulic load.
  • A separate high COD stream was directed to MEE, leading to scaling and fouling in MEE.

Volume of stream to MEE: 10 KLD
COD: 150000 ppm
TDS: 80000 ppm

Financial Challenges:
  • Urea-DAP consumption: 2160 Kg/month of Urea and 1200 Kg/month of DAP were required to boost the poor biomass in the biological tanks.
  • Electricity consumption: Due to high COD effluent, the power requirement went up from a normal 14250 KWH to 20250 KWH monthly.
  • Raw Water Consumption: Due to high COD influent, there was a need for higher evaporation, hence around 100000 litres of water was used monthly for MEE.
  • Chemical Consumption: Due to high COD inflow in MEE, there was extensive scaling, due to which the MEE needed frequent cleaning with HCL: 22500 kg/month, EDTA: 11250 kg/month.
Extra Costs incurred per month:
CommodityUnits required
Urea(in Biological tank)2160 kg/month
DAP(in Biological tank)1200 kg/month
Raw water consumption100000 litres/ Month approx
HCL (10 % )5500 kg/month
EDTA3200 kg /month
Electricity(MEE)20250 KWH/month

The MEE cost per liter was coming to Rs. 1820/KL for 10 KLD capacity, while the overall WWTP (Wastewater Treatment Plant) cost to treat 450 KLD effluent swelled to Rs. 200/KLD.

The Approach:

The industry partnered with us to improve the efficiency of their biological units and to reduce operational costs using bioremediation in their WWTP.

We adopted a 3D approach that included:

  1. Research/Scrutiny:
    • Our team visited their manufacturing facility to examine the existing ETP process and scrutinize areas of improvement.
    • The visit helped us explore potential ETP optimization strategies in the biological treatment system.
  2. Analysis:
    • We analyzed the previous 3-month cumulative data of their ETP to observe trends in inlet-outlet parameters.
  3. Innovation (Bioaugmentation):
Desired Outcomes :
  1. Reduction of COD/BOD thereby improving the efficiency of biological tanks.
  2. Degradation of tough-to-degrade effluents and develop robust biomass to withstand shock loads.
  3. Reduction in scaling of MEE by reducing COD in biological systems and saving cost using bioremediation.
  4. Reducing consumption of UREA-DAP.
  5. Cost saving by treating high COD streams in main ETP.
Execution:

Our team selected two bioaugmentation products:

  1. T1B Aerobio:
    • A blend of specialized microbes that secrete enzymes capable of degrading tough pollutants like toluene, benzene, and Metformin.
    • Helps in reducing COD/BOD, stabilizing shock loads, and enhancing biomass stability.
  1. T1B MacMi:
    • A plant-based gel that acts as a nutrient source for bacteria.
    • Replaced UREA-DAP to provide essential macro and micronutrients for microbial growth.

                                       

Plan of Action:
  • Diverting 2 KLD of MEE inlet to the main ETP inlet with COD 150000 ppm.
  • Diverting 3 KLD of MEE reject to main ETP inlet with COD 25000 ppm.
  • Dosing of T1B Aerobio in all three biological tanks.
  • Dosing of T1B MacMi in all three tanks.

Average Inlet COD after the addition of streams: 18406 PPM

Results:
ParametersInlet parameters Secondary Outlet parameters (ppm)
COD18406-19000 ppm2200 ppm
BOD9290 to 10000 ppm1400 ppm 
Cost Saving :
CommodityUnits required before treatmentUnits required after treatment
Urea2160 kg/month432 kg/month
DAP1200 kg/month240 kg/month
Raw water consumption100000 litres/ Month approx50000 litres/Month
HCL (10 % )5500 kg/month4000 litres/month
EDTA3200 kg /month2050 litres/month
Electricity(Extra)675 KWH/day478 KWH/day

The MEE operational cost reduced to Rs. 1220/KLD, and the ETP cost was reduced to Rs. 160/KLD using bioremediation.

Key Achievements:
  • 85-89% COD & BOD reduction.
  • 20% reduction in ETP OPEX.
  • Full-capacity operations restored using bioremediation.
  • MEE dependency reduced.

🔹 Discover More on YouTube – Watch our latest insights & innovations!

🔹 Connect with Us on LinkedIn – Stay updated with expert content & trends!

Challenges faced in Adhesive effluent treatment with shock load
Adhesive Effluent Treatment with Shock Load Challenges
Introduction:

The adhesive effluent treatment from a manufacturing industry contains a variety of pollutants, depending on the type of adhesives being manufactured (e.g., water-based adhesives, solvent-based adhesives, hot-melt adhesives, or reactive adhesives). The main pollutants typically found in industrial wastewater treatment for the adhesive industry include:

An adhesive manufacturing plant in Pune with an overall capacity 750 KLD effluent treatment plant (ETP) faced issues due to the presence of certain contaminants such as:

  • VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds): Benzene, Ethyl Acetate, Acetone, etc. (from solvent-based adhesives).
  • Resins & Polymers: Acrylic resins, epoxy resins, polyurethanes, or other polymeric residues.
  • Unreacted Monomers: Styrene, vinyl acetate, acrylates, formaldehyde, etc., which are organic but difficult-to-degrade pollutants contributing to outlet contamination and lower efficiency in COD removal along with imposing shock loads.
Plant Details:
Flow Rate 750 KLD
Inlet COD: 8000-1000 ppm
Inlet TDS6000 PPM
Aeration Tank 1 Capacity800 KL
Aeration Tank 2 Capacity350 KL
COD reduction efficiency of secondary system40%-50%
Research and Analysis:

The plant’s Effluent Treatment Plant (ETP) was comprehensively evaluated to diagnose wastewater treatment challenges through site visits. Key issues identified were:

  • High COD levels caused by organic pollutants and chemical residues.
  • Frequent upsets due to shock loads from multiple industrial effluent streams.
  • Poor microbial performance in the biological treatment system.
  • Unsustainability and low MLVSS (Mixed Liquor Volatile Suspended Solids), leading to inefficient biodegradation of industrial effluents.
Innovation:

T1B Aerobio: Enhancing Biological Treatment Performance

T1B Aerobio is a specially formulated biological treatment solution powered with 76+ robust bacterial strains designed to degrade complex organic compounds in adhesive industry wastewater. Its high-performance microbial strains secrete enzymes that efficiently break down tough-to-degrade contaminants that indigenous microbes fail to degrade.

Execution:
Plant Optimization:
  • Adjusted Return Activated Sludge (RAS) and Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) to enhance the secondary biological treatment system efficiency.
Dosing Regime:

A 60-day microbial dosing schedule was implemented:

  • Phase 1 (Days 1-30): High initial dose to establish a dominant biological culture for effective COD degradation.
  • Phase 2 (Days 31-60): Maintenance dosing to sustain color removal and COD reduction.
Monitoring Parameters:
  • COD and BOD (Biochemical Oxygen Demand) levels.
  • Sludge Volume Index (SVI) and sludge settling characteristics.
Observations:

The addition of T1B Aerobio resulted in significant improvements in adhesive effluent treatment. Key observations are summarized below:

ParameterDay 1Day 15Day 30Day 45Day 60
COD (ppm)10,0007,5004,7002,500945
BOD (ppm)4,3002,8001,200850400
SVI (mL/g)2025323540
Results:
  • COD Reduction: Achieved a 91% reduction in COD levels by Day 60, ensuring compliance with environmental discharge standards.
  • BOD Reduction: Achieved a 90% reduction in BOD levels, meeting wastewater discharge norms.
  • Improved Sludge Settling: Optimized Sludge Volume Index (SVI) values, leading to better sludge compaction and reduced carryover.
  • Shock Load Management: Frequent ETP upsets were effectively controlled.
Conclusion:

The application of T1B Aerobio significantly improved the performance of the adhesive industry’s effluent treatment plant (ETP). Enhanced biological treatment facilitated the degradation of hard-to-degrade organic pollutants, stabilized microbial activity, and maintained ETP efficiency under shock load conditions.

🔹 Discover More on YouTube – Watch our latest insights & innovations!

🔹 Connect with Us on LinkedIn – Stay updated with expert content & trends!

phenol management for industries
Phenols in Industrial Effluents: Challenges and Solutions

Phenol in industrial effluents are among the most challenging and hazardous compounds to manage. Industries such as Pharmaceuticals, Agrochemicals, Organic Chemicals, and Textiles generate wastewater containing high concentrations of phenols. Despite having well-equipped wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), 60% of industries still struggle with phenol management, leading to increased CAPEX, OPEX, and regulatory non-compliance.

🌐 Visit: www.teamonebiotech.com/contact-us

Phenols pose significant environmental and health risks. If consumed, they can be highly toxic, making their proper management critical. Efficient waste recycling strategies and robust water treatment plant projects are essential to tackling phenol contamination effectively.

What Are Phenols?

Phenol in industrial effluents are organic compounds characterized by a hydroxyl group (-OH) attached to an aromatic benzene ring. While they occur naturally in plants, they are also synthetically produced and widely used in various industrial processes.

Industries with Phenol Presence
  • Petrochemical Industries
    • Origin in Crude Oil: Phenols naturally occur in crude oil due to the decomposition of organic matter over time.
    • Formation During Refining: Processes like catalytic cracking, hydrocracking, and thermal cracking can produce phenolic compounds as byproducts.
  • Chemical Industries
      • Use in Plastics: Phenolic resins, formed from phenol and formaldehyde, are used in molded products, laminates, and coatings.
      • Use in Resins: Phenolic compounds play a crucial role in epoxy resin production, used for coatings and adhesives.
      • Byproduct Formation: Chemical reactions involving phenols often generate phenolic byproducts and contaminants in wastewater.
      • Incomplete Purification: Poorly optimized purification steps can lead to residual phenols in final products and wastewater.
  • Textile Manufacturing
    • Dyeing: Phenolic compounds act as dye carriers, mordants, and fixatives.
    • Printing: Used in textile printing pastes and inks.
    • Finishing: Added to textiles for flame retardancy, water repellency, and antimicrobial properties.
  • Pharmaceutical Industries
    • Drug Synthesis: Phenolic compounds serve as precursors in the synthesis of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs).
    • Formulation: Used as stabilizers, preservatives, and antioxidants.
    • Biopharmaceutical Production: Support cell culture growth and therapeutic protein production.
  • Agrochemical Industries
    • Pesticides: Enhance pesticide effectiveness and stability.
    • Herbicides: Found in products like glyphosate and 2,4-D.
    • Fungicides: Used in copper-based compounds and phenylphenol derivatives.

Industry-Wise Effects on Effluents
Petrochemical Effluents
  • Contain phenolic compounds from process streams, cooling water, and liquid discharges.
  • Contributing factors: process water, spills, and leaks.
Textile Effluents
  • Dyeing and Printing Chemicals: Phenolic-based dyes, carriers, and auxiliaries add to phenol in industrial effluents.
  • Process Wastewater: Dye baths and printing solutions release phenolic compounds.
Pharmaceutical Effluents
  • Chemical Synthesis: Generates phenolic byproducts and impurities.
  • Purification & Isolation: Incomplete purification results in phenols in waste streams.
  • Formulation & Packaging: Phenolic preservatives may leach into solutions.
Agrochemical Effluents
  • Phenols originate from reaction byproducts, incomplete purification, and waste disposal.
  • Manufacturing & Formulation: Used in raw materials and solvent applications.
  • Application & Spraying: Pesticide use contributes to phenol dispersal via drift, runoff, or volatilization.
Estimation of Phenol Concentration in Effluents

Industries typically follow six methods:

  • Colorimetric Methods
  • High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
  • Gas Chromatography (GC)
  • Titration Methods
  • Enzymatic Assays
  • Immunoassays

The choice of method depends on factors like concentration range, sample matrix, sensitivity, equipment availability, and regulatory requirements. Validation ensures accuracy and reliability.

phenol management for industries

Bioremediation: The Antidote for Phenols

Bioremediation utilizes microorganisms to degrade pollutants through enzymatic action.

Key Microbes and Enzymes for Phenol Degradation
  • Phenol Hydroxylase: Converts phenol to catechol (Pseudomonas species).
  • Catechol 1,2-Dioxygenase: Cleaves catechol into muconic acid (aromatic compound degraders).
  • Phenol Monooxygenase: Hydroxylates phenol to hydroquinone (Acinetobacter, Bacillus, Rhodococcus).
  • Hydroquinone 1,2-Dioxygenase: Converts hydroquinone into intermediate products (Burkholderia, Alcaligenes).
  • Phenol Oxidase: Oxidizes phenolic compounds to quinones (Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus pumilus).
  • Laccase: Oxidizes phenols and non-phenolic substrates (Streptomyces, Enterobacter).
Best Treatment Methods for Phenol Degradation

1. Activated Sludge Process (ASP)

  • Maximizes phenol degradation in a biological treatment tank using specific microbial cultures.
  • Frequently used in wastewater treatment plants to remove phenolic contaminants efficiently.

2. Biofilters

  • Media Bed: Uses organic materials like compost or synthetic media to support microbial growth.
  • Microbial Action: Bacteria and fungi metabolize phenols into less harmful compounds.
  • Pollutant Removal: Effluent passes through biofilters, reducing phenol concentration.
  • Aeration & Moisture Control: Optimized oxygen and moisture levels enhance microbial activity.
  • Applied widely in effluent treatment plant manufacturers and wastewater treatment companies in India.
Conclusion:

Phenol in industrial effluents remains a significant challenge for industries, requiring advanced treatment solutions to mitigate environmental and regulatory risks. Bioremediation, particularly through activated sludge processes and biofilters, provides an effective, eco-friendly solution for phenol degradation, ensuring compliance and sustainability.

For industries investing in water treatment plant projects, domestic waste management, and waste recycling, adopting innovative phenol degradation techniques is crucial for sustainable industrial operations.

Are you looking for a reliable wastewater treatment solution?
📞 Contact us today to explore customized bioremediation strategies for your industry!
📧 Email: sales@teamonebiotech.com
🌐 Visit: www.teamonebiotech.com/contact-us

environmental compliance and bioremediation
Environmental Compliance & Bioremediation Solutions for Industrial Wastewater Treatment

The modern world is fast-paced, and trends seem to dictate every facet of life. Today, environmental consciousness, sustainability, and eco-friendly practices are buzzwords we hear everywhere. But while people may talk about environmental sustainability and eco-friendly practices, the truth is that for industries, these are not just trends—they are obligations. It’s not easy to bridge the gap between production processes and pollution control, and it requires serious commitment.With the ever-growing challenges of pollution, water scarcity, and wastewater management, regulatory environmental compliance and bioremediation play a crucial role in ensuring sustainable solutions.

🌐 Visit: www.teamonebiotech.com/contact-us

In India has become more stringent for industries involved in wastewater treatment projects, staying compliant with environmental standards is crucial to ensuring sustainability and operational efficiency.

Environmental compliance and bio remediation

Regulatory Framework for Environmental Protection in India India has developed a comprehensive regulatory framework to oversee environmental protection and bioremediation practices. Some of the key regulatory bodies and rules include:

  • Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC): The primary regulatory authority responsible for setting policies related to environmental protection.
  • Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB): Enforces environmental standards, monitors pollution levels, and ensures industry compliance.
  • National Green Tribunal (NGT): An expert body dedicated to swift adjudication of environmental cases, ensuring adherence to environmental laws.
  • Hazardous Waste Management Rules (2016): Outlines guidelines for handling, treatment, and disposal of hazardous waste, which includes bioremediation methods.
  • Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act (1974) and Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act (1981): Set standards for water and air quality that directly impact bioremediation projects and wastewater treatment plants.

These regulatory bodies enforce acts and rules that directly affect bioremediation practices in various industries, ensuring sustainable management of industrial waste and effective sewage treatment plant design.

Compliance Parameters and Permitted Levels in India Industries in India need to adhere to strict environmental compliance and bioremediation standards. Below are some key parameters and limits set by Indian regulations:

Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974
  • Effluent Standards: Defines permissible pollutant levels in wastewater discharged into water bodies, such as Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) being less than 30 mg/L for effluents.
  • Regular Monitoring: Both dischargers and State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) must monitor effluent quality regularly.
Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016
  • Handling and Disposal: Provides clear guidelines for safe treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, including bioremediation protocols.
  • Permissible Limits: Heavy metals and organic pollutants must comply with strict limits, such as lead (Pb) below 0.1 mg/L.

Environmental compliance and bioremediation

Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016
  • Bioremediation Guidelines: Encourages the use of bioremediation techniques for the treatment of organic waste and composting.
  • Permitted Levels: Standards for compost quality, including permissible levels of heavy metals and pathogens.
National Green Tribunal (NGT) Enforcement
  • Enforcement: NGT enforces environmental laws, ensuring enviornmental compliance and bioremediation compliance with waste management practices. Bioremediation techniques are often mandated in remediation efforts such as the Ganga Action Plan and Bellandur Lake cleanup.
Permitted Levels for Common Pollutants
  • BOD: < 30 mg/L
  • Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD): < 250 mg/L
  • Total Suspended Solids (TSS): < 100 mg/L
  • Heavy Metals:
    • Lead (Pb): < 0.1 mg/L
    • Cadmium (Cd): < 0.01 mg/L
    • Mercury (Hg): < 0.01 mg/L
  • Oil and Grease: < 10 mg/L
  • pH: 6.5 – 8.5

Challenges in Maintaining Compliance Even though there are advanced technologies available, maintaining compliance in industries can be extremely difficult. Here’s why:

  • Lack of Proper Design: Although there are numerous environmental consultants in India, only a few possess the expertise to deliver advanced wastewater treatment plants that align with industry-specific effluent characteristics.
  • Tough-to-Degrade Pollutants: Many industries use substances that are difficult to break down biologically or chemically in effluent treatment plants (ETPs), creating additional challenges in maintaining compliance.
  • Coordination Gaps: Industries often have multiple production lines with different types of effluents, making it difficult to predict the strength and volume of incoming waste. The lack of communication between production units and the Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) team leads to unpredictable shock load situations.
  • Misinformation and Misconceptions: There is a common misconception that traditional materials like cow dung or untreated sewage water can be effective for treating all types of industrial effluents. However, these solutions are far from sufficient.

Effective waste water remediation

How Bioremediation Addresses These Challenges Bioremediation is an innovative and effective solution for addressing wastewater treatment challenges, ensuring industries comply with stringent regulations while promoting sustainability.

  • Works with Imperfect Design: With the right choice of robust microbes, the bioremediation process can function even in poorly designed wastewater treatment plants.
  • Degrades Tough Pollutants: Microorganisms used in bioremediation are capable of degrading pollutants that are otherwise hard to treat using conventional methods.
  • Handles Multiple Streams & Shock Loads: Bioremediation can easily handle multiple effluent streams and manage shock loads, making it ideal for industries with fluctuating wastewater characteristics.
  • Better Than Conventional Solutions: Unlike ineffective and outdated sewage disposal methods like using cow dung or untreated sewage, bioremediation employs scientifically proven methods for waste degradation.

For industries facing stringent compliance challenges, bioremediation offers a scalable, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly solution to meet regulatory standards and achieve sustainability goals.

Key Takeaways:
  • Environmental compliance is a critical requirement for industries in India.
  • Bioremediation offers an advanced, eco-friendly alternative to traditional wastewater treatment methods.
  • Proper application of bioremediation can address the most challenging pollutants and ensure compliance with stringent regulations.
  • Embracing enrionmental compliance and bioremediation technologies is not just about staying compliant—it’s about adopting a responsible approach to environmental sustainability.
Conclusion: 

For industries required to comply with environmental standards, bioremediation presents an effective and reliable pathway to achieving compliance and minimizing environmental impact. By integrating bioremediation technologies, industries can not only meet regulatory requirements but also actively contribute to water recycling, sustainable wastewater treatment projects, and overall environmental responsibility.

Are you looking for a reliable wastewater treatment solution?
📞 Contact us today to explore customized bioremediation strategies for your industry!
📧 Email: sales@teamonebiotech.com
🌐 Visit: www.teamonebiotech.com/contact-us

Red worms in ETP
Understanding the Impact of Red Worms in Effluent Treatment Plants: A Reasoned Analysis

Worms in Effluent Treatment Plants (ETPs) play a crucial role in wastewater treatment and domestic waste management before discharge into the environment. When red worms—commonly the larval stage of chironomid midges—start to appear, they often signal underlying issues in the treatment process.

In this article, we’ll dive into the reasons behind their occurrence, the negative impacts they cause, and the logic behind effective remedies.

🌐 Visit: www.teamonebiotech.com/contact-us

worms in effluent treatment plants

Why Do Red Worms Occur?
High Dissolved Oxygen (DO) Levels

What Happens: ETPs, a key part of any water treatment plant project, are aerated to promote microbial growth, but if the DO level exceeds the optimal range (usually 1.5–2.5 mg/L), it creates an environment that red worms favor over the essential microbes.

Why It Matters: Elevated DO can stress the desired bacterial population while simultaneously encouraging the proliferation of red worms, which are more tolerant to these conditions.

Excessive Organic Load Fluctuations

What Happens: Variations in the organic load (the amount of biodegradable material) can destabilize the microbial ecosystem in wastewater treatment plants.

Why It Matters: When the microbial community is under stress due to inconsistent feed rates, red worms may fill the ecological niche left by the declining beneficial bacteria.

Poor Sludge Age Control (Low Sludge Retention Time, SRT)

What Happens: Short SRT doesn’t allow enough time for beneficial microorganisms to multiply, leading to an underdeveloped microbial community.

Why It Matters: A weakened microbial ecosystem cannot outcompete red worms for food, allowing these worms to thrive.

Overgrown Sludge in Clarifiers

What Happens: When sludge accumulates in clarifiers due to inadequate removal, it provides an ideal habitat and food source for red worms.

Why It Matters: This accumulation not only signals poor plant maintenance but also accelerates red worm breeding, which can be problematic for effluent treatment plant manufacturers striving for optimal performance.

High Temperature and Seasonal Variations

What Happens: Warmer temperatures often speed up biological processes, including the life cycle of red worms.

Why It Matters: Seasonal temperature changes can create windows of opportunity for red worms to multiply rapidly, especially if other process parameters are not adjusted.

Effect of worms in effluent treatment plants

The Ill Effects of Red Worm Infestation

When red worms become abundant, their effects ripple through the wastewater treatment system:

Degradation of Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids (MLSS)

Red worms feed on microbial biomass, reducing the concentration of active bacteria necessary for breaking down pollutants.

Poor Sludge Settling

The physical presence of red worms in effluent treatment plants interferes with the aggregation of sludge particles. This leads to a higher Sludge Volume Index (SVI) and results in inefficient settling, complicating sludge handling and removal.

Increased Suspended Solids in Effluent

As red worms break down, their remnants add to the suspended solids. This can cause the treated water from a wastewater treatment plant to exceed discharge standards, posing environmental risks.

Foul Odor and Aesthetic Issues

The decay of these organisms releases unpleasant odors, affecting working conditions at the plant and indicating deeper imbalances in the treatment process.

Remedies and the Reasoning Behind Them
Optimizing Aeration Levels

Maintaining DO levels within the optimal range (1.5–2.5 mg/L) ensures that the environment is conducive to beneficial microbial growth while discouraging red worms. This balance is crucial for efficient wastewater treatment.

Adjusting Sludge Retention Time (SRT)

A longer SRT promotes a robust microbial community, including higher life forms such as protozoa, which can naturally prey on red worms. This helps restore the ecological balance within the ETP.

Regular Sludge Wastage

Removing excess sludge prevents it from becoming a breeding ground for red worms. Routine maintenance of clarifiers is essential for effective waste recycling and ensures proper sludge volume control.

worms in efflients treatment plants and it's impact

Introducing Biocultures and Microbial Solutions

Specialized microbial additives can reinforce the microbial ecosystem. These cultures are designed to outcompete red worms for nutrients, suppressing their growth and restoring the system’s balance.

Controlled Use of Chemical Agents (e.g., Chlorination or Hydrogen Peroxide)

In some cases, carefully dosed chemicals can target red worms without adversely affecting the beneficial bacteria. The key is to use these treatments within permissible limits to avoid further disrupting the biological processes in a wastewater treatment plant.

Temperature Management

Where feasible, regulating the temperature of the wastewater can slow down the metabolic rate of red worms. This is especially useful during warmer seasons when the worms are prone to rapid multiplication.

Physical Removal and Screening

In severe infestations, physical methods such as screening can be employed to remove red worms from the system. This provides immediate relief and can be used in conjunction with other biological and chemical strategies.

Conclusion:

Infestations of worms in effluent treatment plants are more than just a nuisance—they indicate an imbalance in wastewater treatment processes. Each contributing factor, from high dissolved oxygen levels to temperature fluctuations, plays a role in creating an environment where these organisms can thrive. By understanding the reasoning behind each cause, operators and waste water treatment companies in India can implement targeted remedies that restore balance, enhance microbial efficiency, and ensure optimal plant operations. Regular monitoring, process adjustments, and a mix of physical, biological, and chemical interventions are key to keeping red worms in check and maintaining a healthy wastewater treatment process.

Are you looking for a reliable wastewater treatment solution?
📞 Contact us today to explore customized bioremediation strategies for your industry!
📧 Email: sales@teamonebiotech.com
🌐 Visit: www.teamonebiotech.com/contact-us

Scan the code