Capturing Innovation in Action

Just like the monsoon in July, which brings the purest form of water in the form of rain, that chases away the heat and makes the earth wear a green blanket. Team One Biotech also experiences the monsoon with a rain of new opportunity and exploration, not just from India but from all over the world.

July 2025

Stay updated with the latest news, insights, and solutions from the world of wastewater treatment.

In This Issue
  1. Zydus’ trust in our technology
  2. Conquering the fort of High TDS.
  3. Our testament of technology echoed in Spain
  4. Angry Pink-Launching
  5. Pro-tip from the field
  6. Get in touch 
Accepting the challenge of the menacing Ammoniacal Nitrogen

Zydus- The juggernaut of pharma, already bears in name of being compliant with the environment and adhering to a similar vision, they have shown trust in our technology and technical expertise and have asked us to work on one of their effluents with high levels of ammoniacal nitrogen. With giants like Zydus showing trust in us, our confidence is sky-high, motivating us to tackle tough-to-degrade effluents more.

Conquering the fort of High TDS

One of the biggest enemies of microbes in an effluent treatment plant is high TDS, as it ruptures the cell wall, making the most concentrated biocultures ineffective. However, one of our trusted partners who are manufacturer of organic chemicals, gave us the task to reduce COD as High as 30000 ppm in an effluent with TDS of 1,50,000 and above. The task looked very stringent and tough for us, but owing the the largest and most vibrant bank of microbes we have, we were able to formulate a bioculture which not only survived in such high TDS, but also was able to reduce COD, thereby helping industry to reduce its reliance on MEE and saving OPEX.

Check out the case study:

Our testament of technology echoed in Spain

One of our clients in Spain tested our products for solid waste, and this is what he has to say. The biggest achievements are not just orders or payments, but rather testimonials from clients who have received the desired results, which bring real satisfaction.

Angry Pink Launched

As promised in the previous newsletter, we launched one of the biggest disruptions in B2C,

The Angry Pink

Pro Tip from the Field

What does the foam in your Aeration Tank say?

  1. If it is white or light brown
  • No or low biomass
  1. Medium or dark brown with good settling
  • Strong biomass presence.
  1. Black with no settling and septic-like odour
  • Dead Biomass
Let’s Talk

Questions? Need site-specific help?
Write to us: [sales@teamonebiotech.com]
Call us: +91-7769862121
Visit: www.teamonebiotech.com

✅ Follow Us on LinkedIn | YouTube | Facebook

How Bioremediation Impacts Existing Biomass in Effluent Treatment Plants (ETPs)

Addressing Industry Concerns: Does Bioremediation Harm Your Existing Biomass?

One of the most frequently asked questions by industrialists and EHS (Environmental, Health, and Safety) professionals is:

???? What happens to our existing ETP biomass when we introduce biocultures?
???? Will the newly added microbes consume our existing biomass?
???? Our MLSS: MLVSS ratio is already optimized—do we really need biocultures?

These concerns are valid. Biomass plays a crucial role in biological wastewater treatment, and industries invest significant time, energy, and resources in developing a stable microbial population. However, understanding the science behind bioremediation can dispel these doubts and demonstrate how biocultures enhance, rather than disrupt, existing biological treatment systems.

Understanding the Role of Biomass in Biological ETPs

After primary treatment, wastewater enters the biological tank, where biodegradable pollutants are broken down by microbial activity. These microbes release specific enzymes that facilitate the degradation of complex organic compounds, making biological treatment effective.

While some indigenous microbes naturally develop in the tank, their efficiency is limited when handling shock loads or hard-to-degrade pollutants. This is where biocultures become essential.

Why Do We Need Biocultures If Our MLSS: MLVSS Ratio Is Already Sufficient?

  1. Indigenous Microbes vs. Biocultures

✔️ Indigenous microbes naturally exist in the biological tank and can be stimulated using nutrients like UREA, DAP, and JAGGERY. Over time, they help maintain MLVSS levels.
❌ However, they are inefficient when faced with tough pollutants and lack the adaptability to handle shock loads or fluctuating effluent conditions.
✔️ Biocultures, on the other hand, contain a diverse mix of microbial strains, specifically designed to:

  • Improve biodegradation efficiency.
  • Enhance system resilience during variable loads.
  • Reduce sludge production and enhance effluent quality.
  1. The Myth: Will Biocultures “Eat” the Existing Biomass?

❌ No, biocultures do not destroy your existing microbial population. Instead, they complement and strengthen the system by increasing microbial diversity and efficiency.
✔️ Carefully selected biocultures work synergistically with the existing biomass, ensuring faster pollutant breakdown and better system stability.

The Benefits of Introducing Biocultures in ETPs

  1. Enhanced Pollutant Degradation

Biocultures accelerate the breakdown of hard-to-degrade pollutants, including high COD/BOD effluents and recalcitrant compounds.

  1. Increased Shock Load Tolerance

A more diverse microbial system enhances resilience against fluctuating pollutant loads, making the system more stable during peak discharge periods.

  1. Improved Sludge Characteristics

Biocultures optimize sludge volume and settling properties, leading to better sludge compaction and reduced carryover.

  1. Reduced Chemical Dependency

Using biocultures minimizes the need for chemical additives and optimizes the biological system naturally.

  1. Cost Savings & Long-Term Sustainability

With improved biodegradation, industries lower their operational costs by reducing excess sludge, minimizing aeration demand, and achieving better compliance with effluent discharge norms.

Final Thoughts: The Future of Bioremediation in ETPs

Industrial wastewater treatment is evolving, and biocultures play a vital role in making systems more robust, cost-efficient, and environmentally sustainable. Rather than replacing your existing biomass, biocultures work alongside it, ensuring a stronger, more resilient biological system.

Are you looking to optimize your ETP performance?

???? Contact us today to explore customized bioremediation solutions!
???? Email: sales@teamonebiotech.com
???? Visit: www.teamonebiotech.com

Effluent Treatment in the Dyes and Pigments Industry: Bioremediation for Sustainable Wastewater Management

Introduction

The dyes and pigments industry is a major contributor to global industrial water pollution, accounting for approximately 20% of worldwide wastewater contamination. With an estimated 80,000-100,000 kiloliters per day (KLD) of effluent discharge, this sector faces serious environmental and regulatory challenges.

Effluent from dye and pigment manufacturing contains complex organic compounds, heavy metals, and toxic pollutants, making conventional treatment methods inefficient. Bioremediation, using specialized microbial cultures, is an eco-friendly and cost-effective solution for treating both reactive and non-reactive dyes.

In this blog, we explore the challenges of dye effluent treatment, biological solutions for pollutant degradation, and strategies to enhance bioremediation efficiency.

Understanding Dye Effluents: Reactive vs. Non-Reactive Dyes

Dye effluents vary based on chemical composition and solubility. Effective treatment depends on understanding the nature of reactive and non-reactive dyes.

Reactive Dyes

Reactive dyes form covalent bonds with substrates, making them highly water-soluble and chemically stable. This stability, while advantageous for dyeing processes, complicates their degradation in conventional wastewater treatments. Reactive dyes are often associated with high color intensity, recalcitrance, and potential toxicity to aquatic life.

Non-Reactive Dyes

Non-reactive dyes, such as disperse and vat dyes, are less water-soluble and rely on dispersing agents for application. These dyes are hydrophobic and tend to adsorb onto sludge during conventional treatment processes. Despite being less water-soluble, their environmental persistence poses a challenge for biodegradation.

Comparison Reactive Dyes Non-Reactive Dyes
Water Solubility High Low
Biodegradability Low Moderate
Treatment Difficulty More challenging Less challenging
Common Removal Method Biodegradation & Oxidation Biosorption & Enzymatic Treatment

 

Bioremediation: A Sustainable Approach to Dye Effluent Treatment

Why Bioremediation?

Bioremediation utilizes microorganisms and enzymes to break down pollutants, making it a viable alternative to chemical and physical treatments.

✅ Eco-Friendly: No harmful byproducts compared to conventional chemical treatment.
✅ Cost-Effective: Reduces reliance on expensive chemicals and energy-intensive processes.
✅ Versatile: Can be tailored for various dye structures and industry needs.

Microbial Strategies for Reactive and Non-Reactive Dye Treatment

1) Reactive Dyes

Microbial degradation of reactive dyes relies on enzymatic breakdown of chromophoric groups (color-causing compounds). Key enzymes include:

  • Azoreductases: Break azo bonds in azo dyes.
  • Laccases: Oxidize phenolic compounds and aromatic amines.
  • Peroxidases: Degrade complex organic molecules into simpler forms.

Anaerobic digestion is particularly effective for breaking azo bonds in reactive dyes, followed by aerobic treatment for complete mineralization. The use of bacterial strains like Pseudomonas, Bacillus, and fungal species like Phanerochaete chrysosporium has shown promising results.

2) Non-Reactive Dyes

For non-reactive dyes, microbial strategies often involve biosorption and enzymatic degradation. Since these dyes are less soluble, biosorption onto microbial cell walls becomes a crucial initial step. Subsequent degradation is facilitated by:

  • Hydrolases: Break ester bonds in disperse dyes.
  • Oxidative Enzymes: Target vat dyes’ aromatic rings.

Algal-bacterial consortia and fungi like Aspergillus niger have demonstrated efficiency in treating non-reactive dye effluents.

Enhancing Bioremediation Efficiency

Key Strategies for Optimal Dye Effluent Treatment

To maximize biodegradation and treatment efficiency, industries should implement:

  1. Microbial Consortia or Biocultures: Mixed cultures with complementary metabolic capabilities can target diverse dye structures.
  2. Genetic Engineering: Developing genetically modified strains with enhanced enzyme production can accelerate degradation.
  3. Immobilization Technology: Immobilizing microbes on carriers increases their stability and reusability.
  4. Pre-Treatment: Physical or chemical pre-treatment of effluents can enhance dye bioavailability.

 Conclusion: A Step Towards Sustainable Dye Industry Effluent Management

Effluent treatment in the dyes and pigments industry is a critical challenge. Bioremediation presents a sustainable, cost-effective, and efficient alternative to chemical treatments. By leveraging microbial technology, pre-treatment strategies, and process optimization, industries can achieve environmental compliance while reducing operational costs.

Are you looking for a reliable wastewater treatment solution?
???? Contact us today to explore customized bioremediation strategies for your industry!
???? Email: sales@teamonebiotech.com
???? Visit: www.teamonebiotech.com

Case Study: Dairy Effluent Treatment with T1B™ Anaerobio Bioculture

Introduction:
Effluent treatment is a significant challenge in the dairy industry due to the high organic load and variability in wastewater characteristics. Dairy wastewater primarily contains fats, proteins, carbohydrates, and high levels of Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) and Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), originating from milk processing, cleaning, and equipment sanitization.

A dairy processing plant in Gujarat faced persistent issues with their effluent treatment plant (ETP), which utilized an anaerobic-aerobic treatment system. The high COD and BOD levels, along with frequent fat and oil accumulation, disrupted the biological processes, resulting in poor treatment efficiency.

Plant Details:

  • Flow Rate: 250 KLD
  • UASB Tank: 750 KLD
  • Hydraulic Retention Time (HRT): 3 days

The Initial Approach:
Our team conducted a detailed site evaluation, including effluent characterization and operational analysis. The following issues were identified:

  1. High COD levels (>15,000 ppm) due to milk solids and cleaning chemicals.
  2. Elevated BOD levels (>8,000 ppm) from biodegradable organics.
  3. Accumulation of fats and oils inhibiting microbial activity.
  4. Insufficient biogas generation in the anaerobic reactor (>30%).

Effluent Treatability Study:
To address these challenges, we performed a laboratory-scale treatability study using T1B™ Anaerobio. Key objectives included:

  • Evaluating the bioculture’s efficacy in degrading dairy effluents.
  • Assessing fat and oil breakdown.
  • Measuring improvements in COD/BOD reduction and biogas generation.

Microscopic analysis and biochemical oxygen demand tests confirmed the suitability of T1B™ Anaerobio for dairy effluents, demonstrating enhanced organic load degradation and microbial activity.

T1B™ Anaerobio: Enhancing Anaerobic Performance
T1B™ Anaerobio is a specialized microbial consortium designed for high-organic-load effluents. Its robust microbial strains effectively degrade fats, proteins, and carbohydrates while improving methanogenesis. The formulation ensures consistent performance even under fluctuating load conditions.

Execution:

  1. Plant Optimization:
    • Desludging the anaerobic reactor to remove inactive biomass and accumulated fats.
    • Optimizing hydraulic retention time (HRT) for consistent loading.
  2. Dosing Regime:
    • A 60-day dosing schedule:
      • Phase 1 (Days 1-30): High initial dose for microbial seeding and system stabilization.
      • Phase 2 (Days 31-60): Maintenance dose to sustain microbial activity and fat degradation.
  3. Monitoring Parameters:
    • COD, BOD, and fat content reduction.
    • Biogas yield (methane content).
    • Sludge granulation and volatile fatty acid (VFA) accumulation.

Observations:
The implementation of T1B™ Anaerobio led to significant improvements in treatment efficiency. Results are summarized below:

Parameter Day 1 Day 15 Day 30 Day 45 Day 60
COD (ppm) 15,000 10,500 6,800 3,500 1,000
BOD (ppm) 8,000 5,200 3,100 1,800 450
Fat Content (mg/L) 500 320 180 80 20
Methane (%) 25% 27.8% 31% 34.5% 42%

Results:

  1. COD Reduction: Achieved a 93% reduction by Day 60, meeting regulatory standards.
  2. BOD Reduction: Realized a 94% reduction, ensuring safe discharge.
  3. Fat Degradation: Effective breakdown of fats, eliminating clogging issues.
  4. Methanogenesis Improvement: Methane content in biogas increased from 25% to 42%, boosting energy recovery.

Graphical Insights:

  1. COD/BOD Reduction: A cylindrical chart illustrating the progressive decline in COD and BOD levels over 60 days.
  2. Biogas Composition: A cylindrical chart showing the improvement in methane content during the treatment period.

Conclusion:
The use of T1B™ Anaerobio significantly improved the performance of the dairy industry’s effluent treatment plant. Enhanced COD/BOD reduction, fat degradation, and biogas production ensured compliance with environmental standards and contributed to the client’s sustainability objectives.

For more information on T1B™ Anaerobio and our wastewater treatment solutions, please visit our website.

Bioculture for ETP Operations- A Cost-Saving Solution for Industrial Effluent Treatment Plants

Effluent Treatment Plants (ETPs) are critical for ensuring compliance with environmental regulations while maintaining sustainable industrial operations. However, many industries face hidden operational costs that often go unnoticed. For instance, energy costs can constitute up to 40-60% of total operational expenses in wastewater treatment plants, while sludge management and disposal can account for an additional 15-25%. Frequent RO membrane replacements and chemical usage further inflate the maintenance budget.

By identifying and addressing these hidden costs, industries can optimize their ETPs, and one effective solution lies in the strategic use of biocultures. Let’s explore these costs, including their impact on Reverse Osmosis (RO) systems and Multiple Effect Evaporators (MEE), and how biocultures can unlock substantial cost savings.

  1. Energy Consumption: A Silent Drainer

Energy consumption is a significant operational cost in ETPs, especially in processes involving aeration, RO systems, and MEE. Aeration systems, essential for biological treatment, consume a substantial amount of energy. RO and MEE, often used in Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) setups, escalate costs due to high-pressure requirements and thermal energy demand.

Solution with Biocultures: Biocultures enhance the biological degradation of organic pollutants, reducing the Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) and Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) in the influent. By improving biological efficiency, the load on subsequent processes like RO and MEE decreases, lowering energy requirements for treating high-TDS effluents.

  1. Sludge Management: The Hidden Expense

Sludge generation is a byproduct of wastewater treatment, and its transportation, handling, and disposal add up to significant costs. Inefficient biological processes often lead to higher sludge volumes, directly impacting these expenses.

Solution with Biocultures: Targeted biocultures improve the biodegradability of wastewater, reducing sludge production. These microbial solutions optimize the breakdown of organic and inorganic matter, minimizing the quantity of sludge generated and the associated disposal costs.

  1. RO Fouling and Maintenance

RO membranes are prone to fouling due to organic matter, scaling, and microbial growth, leading to frequent cleaning and replacement. These maintenance activities increase operational downtime and costs.

Solution with Biocultures: Pre-treating wastewater with biocultures reduces the organic load and microbial activity before it reaches the RO stage. This mitigates fouling issues, extends membrane life, and reduces the frequency of cleaning cycles.

  1. High Operational Costs of MEE

MEE is used to concentrate wastewater with high Total Dissolved Solids (TDS). The thermal energy required for evaporation is a significant cost factor. The presence of organic compounds in the feedwater further complicates the process, leading to scaling and increased energy demands.

Solution with Biocultures: Biocultures help degrade organic matter and reduce TDS levels in the feedwater, improving the efficiency of MEE operations. Cleaner feedwater minimizes scaling, reduces energy consumption, and lowers maintenance costs.

  1. Non-Compliance Penalties

Failure to meet discharge standards can result in fines, legal battles, and reputational damage. Non-compliance often stems from inadequate treatment efficiencies or inconsistent process performance.

Solution with Biocultures: Biocultures provide a robust and consistent solution for meeting stringent discharge norms. Their ability to adapt to varying wastewater characteristics ensures stable treatment performance, reducing the risk of non-compliance penalties.

  1. Overuse of Chemicals

Many ETPs rely heavily on chemical dosing for coagulation, flocculation, and pH adjustment. Overdosing not only increases operational costs but also generates secondary pollutants.

Solution with Biocultures:  Biocultures reduce the dependency on chemicals by improving the natural biodegradation processes. This minimizes chemical costs and helps maintain an eco-friendlier treatment process.

Here is a visual data representation showing improvements:

Here are enhanced visualizations:

  1. Main Pie Charts:
    • The first row compares the overall cost distributions before and after implementing bioremediation.
    • It highlights reductions in energy, sludge management, chemical costs, and RO & MEE maintenance, while showing an increase in “Other Costs.”
  2. Detailed Breakdown of “Other Costs”:
    • The second row provides clarity on “Other Costs” in both scenarios:
      • Before Bioremediation: Comprises miscellaneous expenses and penalties for non-compliance.
      • After Bioremediation: Includes miscellaneous expenses and contingency savings (reflecting operational efficiency and reduced unexpected costs).

 These visualizations offer a clearer picture of how bioremediation reshapes cost structures.

 Conclusion

ETP operations often involve hidden costs that can erode profitability if left unchecked. By leveraging biocultures, industries can enhance the efficiency of biological treatment, reduce energy and chemical usage, and minimize sludge generation. Moreover, biocultures can improve the performance of RO and MEE systems, translating into substantial cost savings.

Investing in biocultures is not just an operational improvement but a strategic decision to ensure sustainability and financial efficiency. It’s time industries uncover these hidden costs and embrace biocultures for a cleaner, greener, and more cost-effective future.

 

As a next step in maximising the benefits of biocultures, we encourage you to explore our detailed guide on What are Biocultures for Wastewater Treatment – A Complete EHS Guide. In that blog, we dive deeper into how microbial consortia are selected, scaled, and deployed in industrial treatment systems — offering a clear foundation for how these solutions integrate with the systems discussed here.

Explore Advanced Deployment of Biocultures for ETP Operations
For deeper insight into applications beyond the basic myths-vs-truths framework, we invite you to explore our in-depth resource on Myths and Truths of bioremediation. In that guide you’ll find detailed coverage of how specialised microbial consortia are engineered for industrial effluent treatment, including design-parameters, dosing strategies, and long-term system integration. This lays the foundation for bringing clarity to how bioculture for ETP operations really functions in real-world settings.

Contact: +91 8855050575

Email: sales@teamonebiotech.com

Visit: www.teamonebiotech.com

Discover More on YouTube – Watch our latest insights & innovations!-

Connect with Us on LinkedIn – Stay updated with expert content & trends!

Improved COD Removal Efficiency in a CETP Using T1B Aerobio Cultures

Introduction:

A Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) is designed to collect, treat, and discharge effluents from multiple industries. Treating CETP effluent is particularly challenging due to the complex mix of organic and inorganic compounds, heavy metals, and pollutants. The use of bio cultures for CETP wastewater treatment offers a sustainable, cost-effective solution to these challenges.

One of our CETP clients in Gujarat (GIDC) received effluents from diverse sources, including textile, chemical, dyes, intermediate, and food industries. These effluents exhibited high levels of COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand), BOD (Biological Oxygen Demand), and color. The CETP, with a capacity of 100 MLD, utilized SBR technology for wastewater treatment.

ETP Flow chart:

  • Treatment Process: Primary treatment → SBR-based biological treatment.
  • Setup: 10 SBR tanks, each processing 10 MLD of effluent.
  • Flow Rate: 10 MLD
  • COD Levels:
  1. Inlet COD: 1500 to 2200 ppm
  2. Outlet COD (post-SBR): 500 to 700 ppm

Challenges:

  • The CETP sought to improve COD removal efficiency and reduce effluent color levels.
  • It required robust and active bacterial cultures for CETP treatment to handle shock loads during peak seasons and maintain performance during winters.
  • Stabilizing the system’s biomass and enhancing its resilience were key objectives.

The approach: It was decided that we go ahead with one of their worst performing SBR tank.  After conducting a lab base trail and WMA, we went ahead with our techno-commercial offer for 10 MLD for one of their SBR. (Please Note: The lab trial carried out is specifically designed to provide a clear indication of whether our microbial consortia can grow in their effluent along with some reduction in the pollution parameters. WMA shows the health of the current biomass which tell us a lot in terms of the biological efficiency and future direction)

 Steps Taken:

  • Assessment of Active Microbes: Analyzed the current status of active microbes and the overall biological efficiency of the system.
  • Lowering MLSS (Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids): Reduced MLSS levels from 4000+ ppm to around 2000 ppm to enable faster stabilization of T1B Aerobio cultures.
  • Bioaugmentation with T1B Aerobio Cultures: Introduced robust microbial consortia into the SBR system, gradually establishing a strong microbial population.

Dosing Schedule:

  • Total Dosing: 900 kg of T1B Aerobio cultures over 2 months.
  • Phase 1 (Month 1): Higher doses to establish microbial activity.
  • Phase 2 (Month 2): Maintenance dosing to sustain efficiency.

Results and discussions:

  • The bioaugmented SBR had better reduction in terms of COD removal more by 25 to 40% as compared to their other SBR tanks.
  • The biomass in the SBR tank was much more stable and robust as compared to biomass in other tanks as per the Wastewater Microbiome Report “WMA” as below.

What is Wastewater Microbiome Analysis (WMA)?

 Microscopic analyses of any biological system should be a critical component of any ongoing daily, weekly, or monthly monitor and control programs in your WWTP.

WMA helps you to correlate the health of the system, any changes in floc structures, higher life forms, oxygen penetration, filamentous identification, polysaccharide coating of the bacteria, and suspended solids can be determined by using a high-end microscope and examining the biomass. WMA can help not only show exactly what the health of the system is at a given time but can also help predict which direction the plant is headed if used regularly. It can also help prevent critical upsets, or can also be used as an early warning and help avoid costly chemical consumption

Key Components of WMA:

  1. Floc Analysis
  • Floc Size Distribution: Determines the settleability of sludge. Ideal floc sizes range from 100 to 5000 µm.
  • EPS/Slime Analysis: Evaluates the floc-forming properties of bacteria, which are critical for stable treatment processes.
  • Sludge Age Analysis: Assesses the biological health of the plant using parameters like SRT and MCRT.
  • Oxygen Penetration: Analyzes oxygen availability within flocs, ensuring aerobic conditions for microbial activity.
  1. Filamentous Biomass Analysis
  • Identifies harmful filaments (e.g., Nocardia) that can cause foaming or bulking.
  • Staining methods like Neisser and Gram staining help classify filaments.
  1. Higher Life Form Analysis
  • Identifies protozoa, metazoa, and other organisms that indicate system health and sludge age.

Basic WMA findings

From the microscopic images of bioaugmented SBR (with T1B Aerobio cultures) and non-bioaugmented SBR (without T1B Aerobio cultures) it can be clearly seen the number, size, structure of sample of sludge from treated SBR shows better quantifiable microbial activities then non treated SBR which can also be seen from the better reduction in terms of COD.

Looking to improve your CETP performance? Choose T1B Aerobio cultures for robust, efficient, and eco-friendly wastewater treatment. Contact us today to transform your effluent management system!

Phosphorus Removal from a Sewage Treatment Plant using T1B STP Bio culture

Introduction: Sewage treatment plants (STPs) play a crucial role in maintaining the environmental quality of water bodies. The excessive presence of phosphorus compounds in sewage can lead to the uncontrolled growth of algae, disrupting aquatic ecosystems and depleting healthy flora and fauna. To address this challenge, innovative and eco-friendly solutions like biological treatment with bio-culture for phosphorus removal have gained prominence. One of our clients in Pune was facing persistent issues with high phosphorus levels in wastewater. Their treatment system utilized an activated sludge process (ASP).

STP Flow chart:

  • Treatment Process: Primary treatment → Biological treatment → Tertiary treatment
  • Flow Capacity: 500 m³/day
  • Inlet Phosphorus: 50 ppm
  • Outlet Phosphorus: 40 ppm

Challenges:

The sewage treatment plant faced several challenges, including:

  1. High phosphorus levels in treated sewage, exceeding permissible discharge limits and threatening downstream water bodies.
  2. Operational inefficiencies due to excessive phosphorus loads, adversely affecting overall treatment performance.
  3. Compliance issues with local environmental regulations, posing risks of fines and reputational damage.
  4. A need for improved efficiency in aeration tanks to enhance phosphorus removal efficiency and reduce odour.

Approach:

The biological treatment system exhibited limited efficiency, achieving only 15%-20% phosphorus reduction. Conventional ASP processes struggled to treat organic pollutants and phosphorus effectively, making it difficult to meet stringent discharge standards. The client sought a solution that could optimize the treatment process while ensuring compliance with regulatory norms.

Solution:             

T1B STP Bio-culture, a specialized solution for biological phosphorus removal (EBPR), was introduced. Its unique formulation with polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (PAOs) enabled the efficient removal of phosphorus through intracellular storage.

Steps Taken:

  1. Biocultures Integration: T1B STP Bio-culture was introduced into the aeration tanks. This bio-culture consisted of PAO bacteria adapted to thrive in the plant’s treatment conditions.
  2. Monitoring and Adjustment: Continuous monitoring of phosphorus levels, pH, temperature, and dissolved oxygen ensured optimal conditions for PAO activity. A 60-day dosing plan was implemented, with a higher dose in the first month and maintenance doses in the second month.
  3. Process Optimization: The treatment parameters were fine-tuned to support PAO growth, including adjustments to dissolved oxygen, pH, and temperature.

Observation:

We observed that after the addition of our cultures, The phosphorous level was significantly reduced.

Day 1

 Day 15 Day 30  Day 45  Day 60
phosphorous ppm 50 45 35 22

10

 Results:

The use of T1B STP Bio-culture for sewage treatment delivered significant improvements:

  1. Phosphorus Reduction: Achieved an 80% reduction in phosphorus levels.
  2. Odour Control: Reduced odour by 90%, enhancing the surrounding environment.
  3. Regulatory Compliance: The plant consistently met the discharge standards for phosphorus removal, alleviating environmental and regulatory concerns.
  4. Operational Efficiency: Optimized treatment processes resulted in fewer operational disruptions and higher overall efficiency.

 Conclusion:

The introduction of T1B STP Bio-culture provided an effective, eco-friendly, and sustainable solution for phosphorus removal from sewage. The plant’s efficiency improved significantly, ensuring compliance with pollution control norms and stabilizing overall operations.

By adopting this innovative biological treatment method, the sewage treatment plant set a benchmark for efficient and environmentally responsible wastewater management.

Transforming Dairy Wastewater Treatment: Innovative Treatment Solutions for a Sustainable Future

Wastewater treatment is a process which removes and eliminates contaminants from wastewater. It thus converts it into an effluent that can be returned to the water cycle. Once back in the water cycle, the effluent creates an acceptable impact on the environment. It is also possible to reuse it.

History Of Waste Water Treatment Plant:

Robert Thom, a Scottish engineer, constructed the first wastewater treatment facility at the beginning of the 18th century. The factory used slow sand filters to purify the water before distributing it to everyone, inside the Paisley city limits via an early sewer system.

A sedimentation basin was receiving water from the plant through a bed of dirt and stones. With the aid of coagulants and flocculants, particle settling within the sedimentation basin was hastened by the formation of larger particle flocs. Before the water was kept in a transparent well basin, finer particles were removed in a gravel filter and slow sand filter.

The concept quickly expanded throughout the entire UK and then to Europe, after Thom’s initial construction of a wastewater treatment plant.

Slow Sand Filtration Waste Water Treatment:

Slow sand filtration is a simple and reliable process. They are relatively inexpensive to build, but do require highly skilled operators. The process percolates untreated water slowly through a bed of porous sand, with the influent water introduced over the surface of the filter, and then drained from the bottom. Properly constructed, the filter consists of a tank, a bed of fine sand, a layer of gravel to support the sand, a system of underdrains to collect the filtered water, and a flow regulator to control the filtration rate. No chemicals are added to aid the filtration process.

Wastewater Treatment in Dairy Effluent Treatment:

The dairy industry faces significant challenges in managing wastewater due to the large amounts of organic matter, nutrients, and other pollutants present in the wastewater. Finding sustainable ways to handle dairy wastewater has become more crucial than ever due to mounting regulatory pressure and environmental obligations. To lessen the environmental effect of dairy processing while maintaining compliance and encouraging water conservation, we examine cutting-edge treatment techniques, difficulties, and new technology.

Challenges in the Dairy Wastewater Industry:

The dairy industry faces several challenges related to wastewater management. These challenges stem from the large volumes of water used in dairy production, processing, and cleaning operations, as well as the composition of the wastewater.

Some key issues include:

1.BOD/COD Levels: Rich in fats, proteins, and lactose, leading to high biochemical and chemical oxygen demand (BOD/COD).

  1. 2. Nutrient Overload: Excess nitrogen and phosphorus can cause water eutrophication.
  2. pH Fluctuations: Varying pH levels affect treatment processes,
  3. 4. Suspended Solids: Solids can clog systems and reduce treatment efficiency.
  4. 5. Oil and Grease: Fats and oils can block systems and damage equipment.
  5. 6. Odor: Decomposing organic matter produces unpleasant smells.
  6. 7. Pathogens: Can pose health risks if untreated.
  7. Regulatory Compliance: Strict limits on discharge parameters.
  8. Sludge Management: Handling and disposal of treatment sludge is challenging.
  9. 10. Energy Costs: Wastewater treatment can be energy-intensive.
  10. 11. Chemical Contaminants: Dairy production and cleaning processes include chemical contaminants which is hard to remove.

Introducing T1B Aerobio: Dairy Wastewater Treatment with Advanced Bioremediation Solutions: Reduces aeration processing in Wastewater treatment. Improves functioning & efficiency of biological units in WTP. Useful in activated sludge process bioreactors & biodigestersWith T1B Aerobio, a state-of-the-art bioremediation technology created especially to meet the particular difficulties faced by the dairy industry, Team One Biotech is setting the standard for sustainable wastewater treatment. We provide focused, efficient solutions for your wastewater management needs by providing customized microbial solutions that degrade the high amounts of organic matter—such as lipids, proteins, and sugars—found in dairy effluent.

T1B Aerobio can deliver following results:

  1. Reduces BOD and COD: Our microbes lower BOD and COD, making wastewater less harmful to the environment.
  2. Provides Nutrient Control: Target excess nitrogen and phosphorus, preventing eutrophication and ensuring regulatory compliance.
  3. pH Stabilization: Microorganisms adapt to different pH levels, stabilizing the treatment process.
  4. Suspended Solids Reduction: Break down solids, improving filtration and preventing clogs.
  5. FOG Degradation: Degrade fats, oils, and greases, preventing blockages and reducing equipment damage.
  6. Odor Reduction: Minimize foul-smelling gases, reducing Odors.
  7. Pathogen Control: Outcompete harmful pathogens, lowering health risks.
  8. Regulatory Compliance: Address organic load, nutrient levels, and pathogens to meet regulations.
  9. Sludge Management: Regulate sludge volume, reducing disposal costs and optimizing biogas production.
  10. Cost Efficiency: Reduce energy and treatment costs through optimized biological processes.
  11. Chemical Breakdown: Break down or capture chemical contaminants for safer wastewater.

Summary:

To sum up, Team One Biotech is essential in helping the dairy industry meet the complex issues associated with wastewater treatment. Team One Biotech provides solutions that not only manage the high organic load, nutrient overload, and suspended solids prevalent in dairy effluents, but also limit environmental consequences through the use of cutting-edge bioremediation technology. Their specialized methodology guarantees that every solution is made to fit the unique requirements of the dairy business, taking into account elements like volume, composition, and legal restrictions.

Team One Biotech helps cut operational expenses by improving wastewater treatment process efficiency and lowering energy requirements through sustainable practices. Additionally, by encouraging the harmful contaminants to break down naturally, their bioremediation methods help to protect the ecosystem over the long run.

Are you struggling to manage costs for your industrial wastewater treatment? Take the Next Step Towards Sustainable and Cost-Effective Dairy Wastewater Management Solutions and Technologies.

Connect with our wastewater experts now – +91 8855050575 or sales@teamonebiotech.com

Scan the code