Treating Petroleum refinery effluent with high Sulfide concentration
Industrial Wastewater Treatment for Petroleum Refineries: High Sulfide Removal Using Biocultures

A reputed petroleum refinery approached us due to high concentration of sulfides in their effluents. They tried multiple solutions, including electroplating, RO, etc., but they were very cost-intensive. Also, they received multiple notices from the pollution control board and were paying heavy fines.

In such industries wastewater treatment methods like RO and chemical dosing prove unsustainable so we offered them biological wastewater treatment as an eco-friendly alternative.

To upgrade your facility’s efficiency with proven biological wastewater treatment methods, microbial solutions, and expert consultation, Contact Us.

 
ETP Details:
Parameter Value
Flow (current) 450 KLD
Flow (design) 450 KLD
Type of process Facultative
Capacity of UASB 1250 KL
Capacity of AT 450 KL
Retention Time 90.66 hours (combined)

Challenges:

Parameters (PPM) Avg. Inlet Avg. Outlet
COD 5500–9010 2200–4600
BOD 2500–5800 1300–3000
Sulfides 2000 2000
PAH 1250 680
 
Operational Challenges:
  • The primary treatment was working at 10% efficiency in terms of COD reduction
  • The biological treatment worked at an average of 50% efficiency in terms of COD reduction

They were struggling to control the higher Sulfide levels, and it was inducing shock loads as explained earlier. In this case, the Inadequate aeration in water treatment,   systems contributed to sulfide accumulation, highlighting the need for advanced ETP water treatment process design and management.

 
Tackling Sulfides in ETPs:

To tackle sulfides in ETP, the presence of SOBs or sulfide-oxidising bacteria is a must. The SOBs oxidize sulfides into sulfates. To prevent sulfate accumulation, SRBs or sulfur-reducing bacteria are required; however, SRBs are only effective in anaerobic systems.

Issues with Process:

The main issue with the process was that there was no provision of a separate aeration tank before UASB, where sulfides need to be oxidized into sulfates. This gap in the industrial wastewater treatment design reduced system effectiveness and highlighted the importance of using effective biocultures for wastewater treatment.

 
The Approach:

The industry partnered with us to commission their UASB and aeration tank with increased capacity and restart the plant at its full capacity in terms of hydraulic load.

We adopted a 3D approach:

  1. Research/Scrutiny:
  • Our team visited their facility to go through the process of the new ETP and to scrutinize the value-addition factors.
  1. Analysis:
  • We analyzed the 3-month cumulative data of their ETP to see trends in the inlet-outlet parameters’ variations and the permutation combinations related to it.
  1. Innovation:
  • After the research and analysis, our team curated customized products and their dosing schedules with formulation keeping in mind the plan of action to get the desired results.

This process is called bioaugmentation.
Our tailor-made microbial blends reflect Team One Biotech’s leadership among top biotech companies in India, offering scalable solutions based on site-specific microbial demand.

Desired Outcomes:

  1. Reduction in Sulfide levels in the final outlet
  2. Development of strong biology to withstand shock loads and prevent upsets
  3. Making ETP more efficient regarding COD/BOD and PAH degradation
  4. Reduction in FOG
  5. Improved microbial culture for wastewater treatment effectiveness under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions
 
Execution:

Products Used:

  • T1B Aerobio: Our aerobic bioculture for wastewater treatment consists of blends of several strains SOBs and facultative microorganisms, usually bacteria, along with key trace elements on a complex inert media. t1b-aerobio
  • T1B Anaerobio: Our anaerobic bioculture blend consists of SRBs and other anaerobic microbes that effectively reduce sulfates into H2S and enhance COD/BOD control. t1b-anaerobio

Plan of Action:

  1. A tank of 300 KL before UASB was converted into an aerobic tank, and T1B Aerobio with SOBs was dosed for sulfide oxidation.
  2. T1B Anaerobio was dosed in UASB for sulfate and COD reduction.
  3. The addition of T1B Aerobio was also done in the aeration tank after UASB every day.

This strategic integration of wastewater treatment methods significantly boosted operational stability and treatment consistency.

 
Results:
Parameters (PPM) Avg. Inlet Avg. Outlet (Secondary Clarifier)
COD 5500–9010 900–1300
BOD 2500–5800 350–750
Sulfides 2000 180
PAH 1250 220
 
Before & After Bioaugmentation:

Performance Highlights:
  • The COD/BOD degrading efficiency increased from 50% to 83%
  • Sulfide reduction was achieved up to 91%
  • PAH was also getting degraded up to 82.4%
  • MLSS: MLVSS ratio was optimized
  • Biomass in the ASP system displayed great stability even during shock load situations
  • Methane gas production increased by 12%

These results demonstrate the superior impact of our biological treatment approach when combined with engineered aeration in water treatment design.

To upgrade your facility’s efficiency with proven wastewater treatment methods, microbial solutions, and expert consultation, Contact Us.

???? Email: sales@teamonebiotech.com

???? Visit: www.teamonebiotech.com

???? Discover More on YouTube – Watch our latest insights & innovations!-

???? Connect with Us on LinkedIn – Stay updated with expert content & trends!

aerobic, anaerobic, and anoxic treatment
Anoxic vs. Anaerobic vs. Aerobic Wastewater Treatment
Introduction

Wastewater treatment relies on biological processes to remove contaminants before the treated water is discharged or reused. The three primary treatment conditions—anoxic, anaerobic, and aerobic—each utilize different microbial mechanisms to break down pollutants. Understanding these processes is essential for selecting the most efficient stp water treatment process based on wastewater characteristics and treatment goals.

This blog explores the origins, efficiency, and prominence of each treatment type.For expert solutions in wastewater treatment, visit Team One Biotech.

1. Aerobic Wastewater Treatment
Origins and Development

Aerobic wastewater treatment has its roots in the late 19th and early 20th centuries with the development of the activated sludge process (1913, UK). It gained prominence with the increasing need for effective wastewater management in industrial and municipal applications.

Process Mechanism
  • Requires oxygen to support aerobic microbial activity.
  • Bacteria break down organic matter into carbon dioxide, water, and biomass.
  • Common systems include biological sewage treatment plant, trickling filters, and aerated lagoons.

Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) + O2 + Biomass + nutrients(N/P) → 

CO2 + H2O + new biomass + energy

Efficiency and Prominence
  • Efficiency: High organic matter removal (90-98% BOD and COD reduction).
  • Energy Demand: High energy consumption due to aeration.
  • Sludge Generation: Produces more sludge compared to anaerobic processes.
  • Prominence: Widely used for municipal wastewater treatment and industrial wastewater treatment due to its ability to handle high organic loads efficiently.
2. Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment
Origins and Development

Anaerobic treatment dates back to ancient times when natural decomposition processes were observed in wetlands. The modern anaerobic process was developed in the late 19th century, with advancements in anaerobic digestion of biomass occurring in the 20th century.

Process Mechanism
  • Operates in the absence of oxygen.
  • Microorganisms break down organic matter into methane, carbon dioxide, and biomass through hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis, and methanogenesis.
  • Common systems include Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactors, gases produced in anaerobic sludge digesters, and expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactors.
Efficiency and Prominence
  • Efficiency: Moderate to high COD removal (70-90%) but requires post-treatment.
  • Energy Demand: Low energy requirement; produces biogas as a byproduct.
  • Sludge Generation: Minimal sludge production.
  • Prominence: Used for high-strength industrial wastewater (e.g., food processing, dairy, breweries) and working of sewage treatment plant in developing regions.
3.Anoxic Wastewater Treatment
Origins and Development

Anoxic treatment became prominent with the increasing need for nitrogen removal in wastewater treatment plants. It gained traction in the late 20th century with the development of biological nutrient removal (BNR) systems.

Process Mechanism
  • Operates with no free oxygen but uses chemically bound oxygen (e.g., nitrates).
  • Facilitates denitrification, where bacteria convert nitrates (NO3-) to nitrogen gas (N2), reducing nitrogen pollution.
  • Common systems include anoxic zones in activated sludge plants and sequencing batch reactors (SBRs).
Efficiency and Prominence
  • Efficiency: Essential for nitrogen removal (80-95% nitrate reduction).
  • Energy Demand: Lower than aerobic treatment but requires a carbon source.
  • Sludge Generation: Moderate sludge production.
  • Prominence: Critical for wastewater treatment plants with strict nitrogen discharge regulations.
Removal of nitrogen:

Nitrification: NH4+ +1½O2→NO2 +2H+ + H2O aerobic conditions

NO2 + ½O2→NO3

Denitrification:NO3 + BOD→N2+H2O+COanoxic conditions

Comparison Table
Parameter Aerobic Treatment Anaerobic Treatment Anoxic Treatment
Oxygen Requirement High None No free oxygen (uses nitrates)
Energy Demand High Low (energy-positive) Low
Organic Removal Efficiency High (90-98%) Moderate-High (70-90%) Specific to nitrogen removal
Sludge Production High Low Moderate
Prominence Municipal and industrial wastewater Industrial, high-strength wastewater Used in biological nutrient removal
Conclusion:

Selecting between aerobic, anaerobic, and anoxic treatment depends on the specific wastewater characteristics and treatment objectives.

  • Aerobic treatment is highly efficient but energy-intensive.
  • Anaerobic treatment is energy-efficient and generates biogas but may require post-treatment.
  • Anoxic treatment is crucial for nitrogen removal and is often used in combination with aerobic systems.

By integrating these wastewater treatment processes effectively, wastewater treatment plants can optimize efficiency, odor removal, and meet regulatory standards.

If you are looking for expert wastewater management solutions from trusted sanitation companies, including specialized services such as sanitization, and waste removal, we’ve got you covered

For more details on wastewater management solutions, contact us at Team One Biotech.

???? Email: sales@teamonebiotech.com
???? Visit: www.teamonebiotech.com

???? Discover More on YouTube – Watch our latest insights & innovations!-

???? Connect with Us on LinkedIn – Stay updated with expert content & trends!

Scan the code