What are biocultures for wastewater Treatment: A complete EHS guide

This is a detailed article on biocultures for wastewater treatment, covering their importance, working mechanism, applications, and industrial benefits. It explains how microbial consortia improve ETP and STP efficiency, enhance biological degradation of pollutants, and ensure compliance with CPCB and NGT wastewater discharge standards. Contact us if you need industry specific consultation on biocultures utility.

Table of Contents

  1. What are Biocultures for Wastewater Treatment?
  2. Why Do We Need Biocultures?
  3. How Do Biocultures Work?
  4. Types of Biocultures and Formulation
  5. How Biocultures Are Manufactured (End-to-End)
  6. Sector-Wise Applications of Biocultures in Wastewater Treatment
  7. Supporting Conditions for Bioculture Effectiveness
  8. Environmental, Safety & Compliance Considerations
  9. FAQs
  10. Conclusion

Introduction

The current growth of India is exponential in each sector, whether it is defence, semiconductors, industries, or exports, among others. But, there is one more thing where India has an exponential graph, which is pollution, and to be specific, water pollution. Untreated Industrial and sewage wastewater is still one of the biggest menaces that the country is facing, and despite a central body such as the NGT and CPCB in function issuing strict compliance, along with practically every industry having a wastewater treatment plant.

Now the question arises if every industry has a facility to treat wastewater or there are existing STPs to treat sewage, and new ones are being built, then why does this menace of water pollution still exist to such a large scale?

Well, the answer is simple. No hardware can work without proper software. Meaning the infrastructure of an ETP/STP is not enough to treat wastewater. As the maximum work of pollution reduction is done by biological treatment, which uses the same mechanism of nature through which a pile of garbage gets degraded automatically, a dead body is reduced to bones within days, how milk gets transformed into hung curd, or how our food gets digested easily. And the warriors of this mechanism are microbes.

Water pollution is one of the most critical environmental challenges faced by industries today. Despite the presence of advanced Effluent Treatment Plants (ETPs) and Sewage Treatment Plants (STPs), untreated effluents still contribute to high BOD, COD, and TDS levels in water bodies. This is where biocultures for wastewater treatment play a pivotal role.

Biocultures—specialized microbial consortia—are introduced into biological treatment systems to accelerate the biodegradation of organic pollutants, improve sludge reduction, and enhance nitrogen and phosphorus removal. From industrial wastewater management to municipal sewage treatment, biocultures ensure faster recovery from toxic shock loads, stabilize the microbial population, and improve compliance with environmental norms in India.

Now these microbes, when used effectively with proper research and execution, can enhance the pollution-degrading capacity of the wastewater treatment plant 3 times.

What are biocultures for Wastewater Treatment?

Biocultures are combinations of microorganisms that play a crucial role in the biological treatment of wastewater. These microbial consortia work to degrade complex pollutants such as hydrocarbons, phenols, fats, oils, and grease (FOG), ensuring COD and BOD reduction. They are widely used in:

  • Industrial wastewater treatment (pharmaceutical, textile, chemical, refinery, and food industries)
  • Municipal STPs for sewage management
  • Anaerobic digestion systems for biogas generation

This article will focus on the core use of biocultures, the science behind it and how prominent it is.

Why do we need Biocultures?

This is one of the most common questions asked. Let’s first understand why we need external microorganisms when we still have a biological system with a biomass in a wastewater treatment plant. The “workforce” of any waste treatment system is its biomass. In a dynamic state of flux, different microorganisms perish while others proliferate and become more prevalent.

Under extreme circumstances, such as toxic shock, some bacterial populations may be reduced or eliminated, resulting in poor effluent quality. Historically, waste treatment strategies have been slow to recover in such scenarios. In the aeration basin of a typical industrial waste treatment plant, one would expect to find a wide range of bacterial species or strains.

This bacterial diversity is essential because different types of bacteria digest different substances more effectively and efficiently. Regrettably, the vast majority of industrial waste treatment systems never achieve long-term stability. The quantity & the quality of entering wastewater normally vary on a weekly or sometimes even daily basis.

These variances might be caused by batch process production, schedules, chemical spills in the manufacturing plant, ineffective plant equipment, ETP design, process management or human errors. The reality is that biological populations in many treatment facilities never reach optimal numbers or a variety of species. Without bioaugmentation/bioremediation, the indigenous population should be made up of a diverse range of species.

Some of these organisms degrade organic substances more efficiently and effectively than others, generating a settleable biomass. Hence such organisms/microbes are selected and combined into a product called as biocultures, which are then added into the biological systems of a wastewater treatment plant.

Biocultures benefits:
  • Indigenous microbes often fail under extreme conditions (toxic loads, variable pH, high salinity).
  • Biocultures provide robust microbial strains that stabilize the biomass.
  • They ensure faster recovery from shock loads, maintain MLSS:MLVSS ratios, and improve settleability of sludge.
  • They help achieve compliance with PCB, CPCB, and NGT norms for effluent discharge.

How do Biocultures work?

Ideally, the biomass is divided into three populations: Population A (desired indigenous microbes), Population B (other indigenous microbes), and Population C (selected robust microbes). The bioaugmentation/bioremediation program’s purpose is to add bioculture with selected microbial strains to boost Population A’s development, establish the selected robust microbial strains of Population C and reduce Population B. This helps us achieve both the quality and quantity of the bacterial population in a biological system.

Bioaugmentation before and after (1)

Understanding the mechanism of microbes

The microbes remove or degrade organic pollutants through enzymes, following a particular mechanism that is distinct for every kind of pollutant such as :

  1. Carbon removal:


    In wastewater, biodegradable organics are mostly in the form of carbon that contribute to COD/BOD, such as sugars, starches, fats/oils/grease, proteins, alcohols, etc.). Heterotrophic bacteria reduce these organics for energy and cell generation. Here, one portion of carbon is transformed into CO2 + H2O and assimilated by the rest into biomass (MLSS/MLVSS).


Carbon removal process

The above flowchart explains the general pathway of carbon removal by microorganisms through both aerobic and anaerobic mechanisms.

Biocultures with a combination of microbes that secrete hydrolytic enzymes, such as lipase, Oxygenases, and dehydrogenases, etc., are used in carbon removal

2. Nitrogen Removal: The nitrogen removal pathway consists of two steps:

  • Nitrification: In this step, ammonia is converted first into nitrite and then into nitrate in the presence of oxygen by nitrifying bacteria.
  • Denitrification: In this process, the nitrate is converted into nitrogen gas in low quantities or in the absence of oxygen.

The complete process is popularly called the anoxic process. Biocultures with a combination of microbes, such as nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria, are used for nitrogen removal.

Nitrogen removal

 

3. Anaerobic Digestion: It is a four-stage biological process.

 

  • Hydrolysis: In hydrolysis, specialised microbes release enzymes (lipases, proteases, amylases) that cleave the macromolecules into simpler compounds such as fatty acids, amino acids, and sugars.
  • Acidogenesis: Acidogenic bacteria convert these compounds into VFA (acids), alcohols, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide
  • Acetogenesis: The VFAs and alcohols are further converted by syntrophic bacteria into acetic acid, H2 and CO
  • Methanogenesis: Methanogenic archaea consume acetate, hydrogen, and CO₂ to produce methane-rich biogas. This is the energy-harvesting stage, yielding about 55–70% methane in the gas stream, which can be used in boilers, combined heat and power (CHP), or upgraded to biomethane.

Anaerobic Digestion

4. Phosphorus removal:

Phosphate Removal Cycle:

  1. Anaerobic zone: In the lack of oxygen, PAOs take up VFA (acetate/Propionate) for energy.
  2. Aerobic Zone: these PAOs with stored energy then take up PO4-P, and then they are removed by wasting the sludge.

So, in this process, the pollutants are not degraded but absorbed by microbes, which are introduced through biocultures.

These biocultures are directly introduced into the biological tanks where they are either kept in suspended growth or with biofilm carriers or media to enhance surface area for reaction.

Environmental Factors to be considered:

ParameterAerobic (carbon removal)Aerobic (nitrification)Anoxic (denitrification)Anaerobic / EBPR-anaerobicAnaerobic digestion (methanogenic)
DO2.0–3.0 mg/L≥2.0 mg/L (≥1.5 absolute minimum)<0.2 mg/L (ideally ~0.0)≈0.0 mg/L0.0 mg/L
pH6.5–8.57.0–8.0 (nitrifiers slow <6.8)6.8–8.26.8–7.46.8–7.4
Temp20–35 °C20–32 °C (rate drops <15 °C)15–35 °C18–30 °C30–38 °C (mesophilic)
ORP (guide)>+50 to +250 mV>+100 mV−50 to +50 mV<−100 mV (EBPR anaerobic often −100 to −200)<−300 mV
Alkalinity80–150 mg/L as CaCO₃Ensure 7.14 mg CaCO₃ per mg NH₄-N oxidized; keep effluent >50–80 mg/LRecovered in denite2,000–5,000 mg/L (buffering)
NutrientsBOD:N:P ≈ 100:5:1N is already present; ensure enough P.Carbon source available (rbCOD)VFA supply (acetate/propionate)Trace metals for methanogens

Types of Biocultures and Formulation:

The biocultures are generally classified into 3 types:

  1. Aerobic consortia – for COD/BOD reduction in food, beverage, and municipal wastewater.
  2. Anoxic blends – for denitrification in industrial wastewater streams.
  3. Anaerobic consortia – for high-COD wastewater and methane generation in refineries, distilleries, and pharmaceuticals.

The following table gives a clear explanation:

AspectAerobic consortiaAnoxic blendsAnaerobic consortia
Main jobFast carbon (BOD/COD) removal; support nitrificationDenitrification (NO₃⁻/NO₂⁻ → N₂);
Conversion to nitrogen from nitrate/nitrite 
High-strength COD removal with biogas (CH₄) production
Electron acceptorO₂NO₃⁻ / NO₂⁻ (no free O₂)None (strictly reducing); methanogenesis uses CO₂ as sink
Typical microbesHeterotrophs (e.g., Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Comamonas), plus nitrifiers (Nitrosomonas/Nitrospira)Heterotrophic denitrifiers (Paracoccus, Thauera, Pseudomonas), DPAOsHydrolytic/acidogenic bacteria (Clostridium spp.), syntrophs, methanogens (Methanosaeta, Methanosarcina)
Key enzymes/pathsAmylase, protease, lipase; glycolysis → TCANitrate/nitrite reductases; NO₃⁻ → NO₂⁻ → N₂O → N₂Hydrolysis → acidogenesis → acetogenesis → methanogenesis
Best-fit wastesFood & beverage, municipal, tanneries (carbon), commercial kitchens (FOG with lipase-rich blends)Any stream with nitrate from upstream nitrification; low-O₂ polishing zones, tertiary denite filtersDistilleries/ethanol, dairy whey, slaughterhouse, leachate, refinery waste, UASB/EGSB start-ups, digesters
Where to doseEqualization (pre-hydrolysis) and aeration; wet MBBR mediaPre-anoxic/anoxic zone (keep O₂ out)EQ/acidogenic tank or digester feed; not in aerated zones
Operating windowDO 2–3 mg/L; pH 6.5–8.5; ORP >+50 mV; 20–35 °CDO <0.2 mg/L; ORP −50 to +50 mV; pH 6.8–8.2; 15–35 °C; needs rbCODORP <−300 mV; pH 6.8–7.4; 30–38 °C (meso) or 50–55 °C (thermo)
ProsQuick results, odor control, robust to moderate shocks; simple controlSaves aeration/alkalinity; couples well with nitrification/EBPREnergy-positive, lowest sludge yield, handles very high COD
Cons/risksAeration cost; more sludge; nitrifiers sensitive to toxins/low tempNeeds nitrate and carbon; oxygen leakage kills rate; nitrite accumulation riskSlow start-up; sensitive to solvents/sulfides/salts; temperature dependency; potential odors if upset
Success KPIsDownstream COD/BOD drop, stable DO, good SVI/settlingNOx removal across anoxic, alkalinity recovery, minimal gas bubblesRising biogas (CH₄ %), VFA/alkalinity in control, COD removal ↑, foam/odour under control

Biocultures Manufacturing Process

Being a leading manufacturer of biocultures, we can explain the process as below:

Strain sourcing & Safety: Performance-proven strains are selected on the basis of substrate profile and range, growth rate, pH tolerance, temperature, salinity, and surfactants. Mostly, a master working cell bank under controlled storage is maintained with records.

  • Bench Characterisation: Typically, benchtop reactors are in-shaken along with mapping growth curves and profiling of enzymes. Parameters or set points, such as temperature, pH, and the DO control band, are also considered, which vary with every strain.
  • Scale-up (production): The strain is then transferred from bench reactors or flasks to larger volume fermenters, which are already sterilised.
  • Harvest & stabilisation: Harvest is done by centrifugation or microfiltration, followed by stabilisation depending upon the product’s form:
  • Powders: carriers such as maltodextrin, mineral clay, zeolite + protectants (trehalose, skim solids) are mixed, followed by dry spraying.
  • Liquids: buffered media is used.
  • Encapsulated/blocks: entrap

Where Biocultures are Used: Sector-wise applications

 

1. Food and Beverage (dairy, breweries, soft drinks, bakeries):

  • Effluent Profile: readily degradable organic COD in high content in the form of lactose, proteins, sugars and FOG
  • Major issues: Sudden/burst foaming, morning/evening shock loads, ammonia carryover when nitrification lags.
  • Bioculture Consortia used: Mostly enzyme-rich aerobic consortia that are rich in hydrolytic enzymes ( amylase, proteases, lipase) are used to accelerate hydrolysis. Nitrifiers are used in case of ammonia.
  • Microbial Mechanism: Faster conversion of colloids to soluble carbons. Healthy floc formation occurs with robust and stable biomass development.

 

2. Pulp and Paper:

  • Effluent Profile: High COD effluent with colour, lignin/cellulose fractions and heavy foaming issues.
  • Pain Points: Lignin is one of the toughest components to degrade; hence, biodegradability is low. Colour is also a prominent factor that is very hard to reduce.
  • Bioculture consortia used: Consortia with microbes that secrete enzymes such as Laccases, lignin peroxidases, along with other hydrolytic enzymes are used.
  • Microbial mechanism: the polymers of lignin are cleaved by enzymes, and co-metabolism degrades colour concentration.

3. Textile & Dye

  • Effluent Profile: Consists of dyestuff, common surfactants, high temperature, reactive and non-reactive dyes components.
  • Issues: prominence of refractory colour, which is a visible pollution indicator, along with nitrite spikes. High temperature up to 55°C kills normal native microbes.
  • Bioculture consortia used: Consortia with microbes that secrete enzymes such as reductases, peroxidases, along with other hydrolytic enzymes are used, which should be thermophilic in nature to enhance stability and performance in high temperatures.
  • Microbial Mechanism: the thermophilic bacteria that are viable in high-temperature easily degrade dyestuffs and color.

4. Pharmaceuticals & APIs:

  • Effluent Profile: Consists of inhibitory intermediates, solvents, high ORP swings, high Ammonia, and refractory COD.
  • Issues: high toxicity, long accumulation, shock loads, ammonia spikes and low settling in clarifiers.
  • Bioculture consortia used: Biocultures with De-Tox tolerate blend, a few bacillus strains and nitrifiers can be used.
  • Microbial Mechanism: Biofilm formation, along with EPS binding buffers toxicity, while the bacillus and other strains degrade refractory COD. For Ammoniacal nitrogen nitrifiers in the presence of oxygen, perform the function of nitrification, followed by denitrification by denitrifying strains.

5. Chemical manufacturing (Paints, resins, surfactants):

  • Effluent Profile: Consists of solvents, surfactants, Cyclic-chain compounds, Aldehydes, & Phenols.
  • Issues: high toxicity, shock loads, high TDS, low COD/BOD degrading efficiency.
  • Bioculture consortia used: Biocultures with De-Tox tolerate blend, a few bacillus strains and nitrifiers can be used.
  • Microbial Mechanism: Biofilm formation, along with EPS binding buffers toxicity, while the bacillus and other strains degrade refractory COD.

 

6. Petrochemical/refineries:

  • Effluent Profile: prominence of alkanes, Aromatics, emulsified oil and specifically PHA
  • Issues: surfactant interactions, emulsion that passes without degradation, inducing odour, high PHA at outlets affecting efficiency, even loss of sludge blanket in the UASB process and low methanogenesis.
  • Bioculture consortia used: Biocultures with hydrocarbon-degrading as well as lipase-producing strains, anaerobic strains with similar properties for UASBs.
  • Microbial Mechanism: The enzymes, such as mono/di oxygenases, crack hydrocarbons, lipases split triglycerides and PHAs. The Anaerobic strains form heavy flocs that can settle at the bottom to strengthen the sludge blanket.

 

Case Studies:


  1. Pharmaceutical(API) company in Gujrat:


Challenges:

The COD, BOD and Ammoniacal Nitrogen were always high above the discharge limits in spite of having a high amount of MLSS & MLVSS in all their aeration tanks. The EHS department of the industry was under pressure to maintain the parameters as per the PCB norms.  Some consultants had also suggested having an MBR after the ASP process, which unfortunately was not providing the desired output.

ETP Flow chart:

Primary- Biological and Tertiary systems, with RO & MEE. The activated sludge process (ASP) has 3 aeration tanks in series and one anoxic tank before the aeration tanks.

Flow:200 m3/day
Inlet COD:14,000 to 17,000 ppm
Inlet Ammoniacal Nitrogen:280 to 320 ppm
COD outlet after biological treatment:9000 to 12000 ppm
Ammoniacal Nitrogen after biological treatment220 to 270 ppm

 

Bioculture Selection and Dosing

A blend of microbial strains that were capable of degrading recalcitrant compounds, aromatics, phenols and long-chain carbons was created and incorporated into bioculture, which was dosed in the aeration tanks for 8 weeks.

Results:

Results and discussions:

  • 91 % reduction in COD and 75% reduction in TAN levels after 60 days and today the COD is in the range of 500 to 450 ppm in their biological outlet.

  1. EBPR-Phosphate removal:


A prominent chemical manufacturing unit situated in MP near Ratlam wanted to treat an effluent stream with a high phosphate content of up to 1500-2000 ppm. They wanted to use their old ETP, revive it, commission it, and make it efficient for phosphate treatment.

1st Phase: Scrutiny
  • OLD ETP details:

The ETP had primary treatment, biological treatment (Anaerobic), and then a tertiary treatment.

Flow (current)350 KLD
Type of processUASB
No. of UASBR1
Capacity of biological tank950 KL

Parameters of the stream with Phosphate:

Parameters Avg. Inlet parameters(PPM)
COD4300
Phosphate Content1500-1800
TDS3000
2nd Phase: The Blueprint

After scrutiny, it was concluded to transform the old ETP apparatus into an EBPR unit, i.e., Enhanced Biological Phosphorus removal unit, which involves the introduction of PAOs (polyphosphate-accumulating bacteria) into the biological system along with physico-chemical treatment in primary and tertiary systems, respectively, of the old ETP.

ETP process optimisation:

An efficient EBPR unit requires anaerobic as well as aerobic systems, as in anaerobic, the RbCODs get transferred into VFAs, which are then absorbed by PAOs for efficient phosphate uptake, which is dispersed during the anaerobic process. The PAOs then absorb the phosphate rapidly in the aerobic system. Hence, biomass with phosphate-absorbed PAOs is allowed to settle in the clarifier, and then WAS is removed.

In this scenario, the ETP had a UASB system, but no Aeration system, hence:

  1. We utilised a spare tank of capacity 300 KL located next to USABR, and transformed it into an aeration tank by installing diffusers.
  2. After our recommendation, the industry installed a 50 KL FRP clarifier after the sedimentation system.

Hence, the old ETP now had a facultative EBPR system.

3rd Phase: Technology and Execution
  1. Selecting biocultures:

For UASB:

The perfect solution for an Anaerobic system consists of robust bacteria that can efficiently work in anaerobic conditions, leveraging efficiency in terms of:

  • COD reduction
  • Biomass Generation
  • Methane Generation
  • F/M ratio optimization

Here, since the goal was phosphate reduction, we amalgamated PAOs as well, which made the product extremely effective to be used in the developed EBPR system.

For Aerobic Tank:

Highly robust and selective strains of bacteria, which, when combined with PAOs.

Results:

After 60 days of implementation:

Parameters Primary OutletUASB OutletClarifier Outlet
COD39001900800
Phosphate1300-1500850-900180
COD Reduction10 %~ 55 %82 %
Phosphate reduction %8-10%~ 65 %~85-90%

Supporting Conditions for Biocultures in Wastewater Treatment:

  • Essential Parameters to be maintained:
  1. DO: 1.5 to 3 is essential in an aerobic process to produce the best results from biocultures for wastewater treatment.
  2. pH: Neutral pH is recommended, but the range between 6.5 and 8 is preferable.
  3. Temperature: The ideal range for optimum performance should be 20-35 °C, but some thermophilic strains can thrive up to 55 °C
  4. ORP: For anaerobic, it should be between -100 and -300 mV.
  • Feed & Nutrients:
  1. Carbon removal: For aerobic carbon removal, aim BOD:N:P ≈ 100:5:1 (by mass)
  2. For denitrification: Keep a readily biodegradable carbon source: rule-of-thumb-3-6 g COD/g of NOx-N removed.
  3. For EBPR: ensure adequate VFAs (acetate) in the anaerobic zone.
  • Dissolved Oxygen & Redox Zoning:
  1. Aerobic system: 1.5-2 ppm DO
  2. Nitrification: 2-3 ppm DO
  3. Anoxic: DO between 0.2 and 0.8 ppm
  4. Anaerobic/EBPR Anaerobic: 0 ppm

 

  • SRT, HRT & loading (F/M)
  1. SRT(solids retention time) should be around 6-12 days for COD removal, 15-25 days for Nitrogen removal.
  2. F/M ratio should be between 0.15 and 0.35.
  3. SVI; healthy range should be between 80-150 mL/g
  4. Control RAS and wasting to keep MLSS/SVI in range.
  5. Add/strengthen selector zones if filaments rise; avoid over-aeration that strips CO₂ and spikes pH.
  • Micronutrients & trace metals
  1. Trace Fe, Mg, Ca, K, Na, Mn, Zn, Cu, Mo, Co, Ni, are some of the essential micronutrients.
  2. They support enzyme functions, floc formation, methanogenesis, etc.

Apart from these points, biocultures should be stored in a cool and dry place.

FAQs of Biocultures

1.How long before I see COD/BOD improvements?

The ideal time when improvements are observed is within 72 hrs in ideal conditions; however, 7 days in maximum time for visible improvements.

2.Will they work in high Salinity?

Only biocultures with halophilic strains can survive high TDS above 30000 ppm; others get their cell walls ruptured in high salinity.

3.What if influent composition changes daily?

Multiple stream effluents should be equalised first, and a bioculture with multiple strains can work. This process is called bioaugmentation.

4.Can biocultures reduce sludge volume meaningfully?

Yes, they can reduce the sludge meaningfully; however, HRT, SRT and wasting are important factors to be tracked as well.

5.Do I need to stop chemicals when using biocultures?

Chemicals for primary treatment, especially for pH control and coagulation-flocculation, are necessary; however, effective biocultures can reduce their quantity to some extent.

6.Can I use them in grease traps/septic at small facilities?

Yes, biocultures with FOG-degrading strains can be used.

7.Any red flags when buying biocultures?

A vendor/manufacturer giving fake guarantees without studying and analysing the problem of your wastewater treatment plant.

Conclusion:

Nature’s best healing mechanism, i.e microbes, is simple yet extremely effective, especially for wastewater treatment. They are very tiny in size but mighty in effect, and when the right combination of such microbes is created, 60% of wastewater treatment problems are solved.  Biocultures for wastewater treatment are proven and effective technologies that have been with us forever, but we have realised their potential in the wastewater sector very late, and it is still misunderstood and unexplored.

Refrences

Guidelines-UTE-Irrigation.pdf

7thEditionPollutionControlLawSeries2021.pdf

Images:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347981511/figure/fig3/AS:975158504329216@1609507313214/Four-steps-in-the-anaerobic-digestion-process-Zhang-et-al-2014.png

Biological nitrogen removal processes in wastewater treatment (Metcalf and  | Download Scientific Diagram

Anaerobic process of wastewater treatment depicting both… | Download Scientific Diagram

 
Explore More Solutions by Team One Biotech

As one of the leading biotech companies in India and trusted bioremediation companies in India, Team One Biotech continues to deliver solutions that redefine sustainability across wastewater treatment, agriculture, aquaculture, and hygiene management. Contact us here for free consultation.

Email: sales@teamonebiotech.com

Visit: www.teamonebiotech.com

Discover More on YouTube – Watch our latest insights & innovations!-

Connect with Us on LinkedIn – Stay updated with expert content & trends!

 

 

Sulphide removal in refinery wastewater
Sulfide Removal in Petroleum Refinery Wastewater | Case Study

Introduction: 

A reputed petroleum refinery approached us due to high concentration of sulfides in their effluents. They tried multiple solutions, including electroplating, RO, etc., but they were very cost-intensive. Also, they received multiple notices from the pollution control board and were paying heavy fines. In petroleum refineries, Effluent Treatment Plants (ETPs) are critical for managing complex wastewater containing sulfides, phenols, and hydrocarbons. Our advanced bioculture-based solutions ensure consistent COD and BOD reduction, even under fluctuating hydraulic and organic loads. Reach out to us today to experience how our bioculture-driven solutions can turn wastewater challenges into success stories.

ETP details:

The industry had primary treatment, biological treatment, and then a tertiary treatment.

Previous Capacity

Flow (current) 4500 KLD
Flow (design) 4500 KLD
Type of process Facultative
Capacity of UASB 12500 KL
Capacity of AT 7500 KL
Retention Time 106.66 hours(combined)

Challenges: 

Parameters (PPM) Avg. Inlet parameters  Avg. Outlet parameters 
COD 5500-9010 2200-4600
BOD 2500-5800 1300-3000
Ammoniacal Nitrogen 200 120-150
PAH 1250 680

Operational Challenges :

  • The primary treatment was working at 10 % efficiency in terms of COD reduction 
  • The biological treatment worked at an average of 50 % efficiency in terms of COD reduction. 

They were struggling to control the higher AN levels, and it was inducing shock loads as explained earlier. 

Issues with Process:

The main issue with the process was that there was no significant reduction in AN at the outlet despite having a UASB and an Aeration tank

The Approach: 

The industry partnered with us to commission their UASB and Aeration tank with increased capacity and restart the plant at its full capacity in terms of hydraulic load.

We adopted a 3D approach that included :

  • Research/Scrutiny :  
  • Our team visited their facility to go through the process of the new ETP and to scrutinize the value-addition factors.
  • Analysis :
  • We analyzed the 3-month cumulative data of their ETP to see trends in the inlet-outlet parameters’ variations and the permutation combinations related to it.
  • Innovation : 
  • After the research and analysis our team curated customized products and their dosing schedules with formulation keeping in mind the plan of action to get the desired results.

This process is called bioaugmentation.

Desired Outcomes :

  1. Reduction in AN levels in the final outlet
  2. Development of strong biology to withstand shock loads and prevent upsets.
  3. Making ETP more efficient regarding COD/BOD  and PAH degradation.
  4. Reduction in FOG.

Execution:

Our team selected  the product :

For the Aeration Tank

  1. T1B Aerobio: Our aerobic Bioculture blend consists of blends of several strains of Nitrifying and Denitrifying bacteria and facultative microorganisms, usually bacteria, along with key trace elements on a complex inert media. t1b-aerobio

For the UASB tank

  • T1B AnaerobioOur Anaerobic Bioculture blend consists anaerobic microbes that will effectively reduce AN as well as enhance COD/BOD control. t1b-anaerobio

Our plan of action included:

  1. T1B Anaerobio was dosed in UASB for sulphate and COD reduction.
  2. The addition of T1B Aerobio was also done Aeration Tank after UASB every day 

Results:

Parameters

Parameters (PPM) Avg. Inlet parameters  Avg. Outlet parameters (secondary clarifier outlet)
COD 5500-9010 900-1300
BOD 2500-5800 350-750
AN 200 20-25 (After Aeration Tank)
PAH 1250 220

The implementation of the bioaugmentation program resulted in significant improvements in the performance of biological units in their WWTP:

  • The COD/BOD degrading efficiency increased from 50% to 83 % in the biological system.
  • AN reduction was achieved up to 90 %
  • PAH was also getting degraded up to 82.4 %.
  • MLSS: MLVSS ratio was optimized.
  • Biomass in the ASP system displayed great stability even during shock load situations.
  • Methane gas production increased by 12%.

The application of Anaerobic Treatment through UASB reactors combined with Aeration tanks enabled effective Ammoniacal Nitrogen control and reduced PAH levels significantly. This approach minimized the risks of shock loads and enhanced the stability of biological systems.

With a focus on Industrial wastewater treatment, we targeted Sludge reduction and improved MLSS:MLVSS ratios to enhance operational efficiency. Our strategies also mitigated Odour issues and prevented the proliferation of filamentous bacteria, ensuring long-term system reliability.

By aligning with CPCB, PCB, and NGT compliance norms, the refinery avoided penalties while achieving sustainable wastewater management. The integration of bioaugmentation technology, nutrient balancing, and biogas recovery further optimized the performance of the effluent treatment process.

This case study demonstrates how refinery clients can achieve reliable wastewater treatment solutions while reducing OPEX, improving sulphide reduction, and ensuring a future-ready industrial effluent treatment system.

As one of the leading biotech companies in India, we provide a sustainable product range across multiple verticals, including probiotics for aquaculture, biofertilizers and plant growth promoterseco-friendly cleaning solutionsanimal probiotics, and on-site consultation for biocultures for ETP and STP.

Email:  sales@teamonebiotech.com

Visit: www.teamonebiotech.com

Discover More on YouTube – Watch our latest insights & innovations!-

Connect with Us on LinkedIn – Stay updated with expert content & trends!

SBR & Biocultures for ETP | Microbial Wastewater Treatment
SBR Systems: Ideal for STPs or Industrial Effluent Treatment Too?

Biocultures for wastewater treatment and microbial culture for ETPs are revolutionizing how biotech companies in India address industrial effluent challenges.

In the world of wastewater treatment, one technology often debated is the Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR). Many engineers and decision-makers see SBRs as a go-to solution for Sewage Treatment Plants (STPs), but the question remains: Can SBRs also be used effectively for industrial effluent treatment, or are they best restricted to municipal sewage?

The answer lies in understanding how SBR wastewater treatment works, its proven performance in municipal applications, and its adaptability in industrial contexts. Get in touch with us to explore how innovative biotech-driven approaches can transform your wastewater management.

What is the SBR Process in Wastewater Treatment?

An SBR (Sequencing Batch Reactor)

is an advanced modification of the activated sludge process. Unlike continuous systems, SBRs operate in time-based cycles—filling, aeration, settling, and decanting within a single task.

This gives the SBR process several key advantages:

  • Compact design  – saves space compared to conventional STPs.
  • Flexibility – can adjust to changing flow and loads.
  • Nutrient removal – capable of reducing nitrogen and phosphorus effectively.Because of these advantages, SBR systems are widely used in modern sewage treatment plants across India and globally. Increasingly, biocultures for ETPs  are also combined with SBR systems to enhance microbial performance and improve treatment efficiency.

Why SBR is Ideal for STP Treatment?

SBR technology has a strong track record in municipal sewage treatment. Studies and performance reports highlight impressive results:

  • BOD removal efficiency : up to 98%
  • COD removal efficiency : up to 96%
  • TSS reduction : up to 97%
  • Nitrogen Removal (TKN) : up to 85%
  • Phosphate removal : up to 99%

These numbers show that SBR-based STP plants can consistently achieve discharge standards of BOD <20 mg/L and TSS <20 mg/L, meeting both CPCB (India) and global environmental norms.

For cities, residential complexes, and institutions, SBR STPs are a reliable, proven choice. Many wastewater treatment companies in India  integrate microbial culture for wastewater treatment

into SBR setups for long-term sustainability.

Can SBR Systems Be Used for Industrial Effluent Treatment?

The answer is yes, but with conditions.

Where SBR Systems Work Well in Industry

  • Food & Beverage Wastewater  – Brewery and dairy effluents respond well, with SBRs achieving significant COD and phosphate removal.
  • Textile Effluent Treatment  – SBRs can cut down BOD and COD effectively. However, color removal may need additional processes like oxidation and membranes.
  • Pulp & Paper, Pharma, and Agro-Industries  – With proper pretreatment and equalization, SBRs can be adapted to these sectors.

Challenges with Industrial Wastewater

  • Toxic or inhibitory loads (dyes, heavy metals, chemicals) can reduce efficiency.
  • Shock loads from sudden spikes in pollutants demand equalization tanks for stability.
  • Advanced polishing may be required for color, nutrient, or refractory COD removal.

In short, SBR for industrial effluent treatment works best for biodegradable loads and when backed by biocultures for wastewater treatment , pretreatment systems, and tertiary polishing technologies.

Operation and Maintenance Considerations

To get the best from an SBR, industries and municipalities must ensure:

  • Screening & Neutralization – Prevents toxic shocks to biomass.
  • Proper Equalization – Stabilizes pollutant spikes.
  • Skilled Operators – Cycle timing, DO control, and sludge management are critical.
  • Hybrid Systems – SBR + tertiary treatment = compliance with stricter discharge norms.

In industrial effluents, SBRs are effective where organic loads are biodegradable, but performance depends on pretreatment, load management, and add-on polishing. Biotech companies in India

are increasingly deploying advanced microbial culture for wastewater treatment  to strengthen biological efficiency and meet CPCB standards.

Conclusion:
SBR wastewater treatment systems are versatile, but they must be applied strategically. They are not one-size-fits-all, but with the right design and integration, including biocultures for ETP  and microbial cultures for wastewater treatment, they can be the backbone of both municipal sewage treatment plants and industrial effluent treatment solutions in India.
GREEN-ENERGY-FROM-WASTEWATER-Biogas-and-Beyond.
Green Energy from Wastewater: How Anaerobic Biocultures Drive Biogas Production in India

The best word that can be an example of a paradox would be ‘Wastewater’. The word itself suggests it’s a waste, and one needs to get rid of it for the sake of saving the environment. But what if I say that this very wastewater can be “useful” too? in chemical energy (think COD/BOD). With the right biology and engineering, you can convert that into biogas, electricity, heat, biomethane (RNG), even hydrogen-and push your plant towards energy neutrality or better.

As one of the agile biotech companies in India, we blend R&D with field deployment for measurable outcomes. We supply targeted biocultures for wastewater treatment to accelerate digestion and reduce operating costs. Our Bioculture programs are designed for both etp and stp facilities, covering shock‑load resilience and sludge reduction. Contact us here.

Why wastewater = energy

Conventional aerobic treatment spends energy on aeration. Anaerobic digestion (AD) flips the script: microbes break down organics in the absence of oxygen and produce biogas (≈55–65% methane) you can burn in CHP engines of oxygen for electricity + heat, or upgrade to biomethane for grid/CNG use. Numerous facilities have demonstrated energy-neutral to energy-positive operation using AD, process efficiency, and on-site generation like the Strass in Austria or Sheboygan in US.

Why going the nature’s way is a game changer?

While anaerobic digestion (AD) is the technology, biocultures are the heart of the process. In AD, specialized microbes break down organics in the absence of oxygen to produce biogas (55-65% methane). The quality and productivity of this gas depend on the microbial community’s health and efficiency. Optimized inoculation and co‑digestion increase biogas production while improving digester stability and dewatering.

Team One Biotech’s anaerobic biocultures are designed to:

  • Rapidly adapt to different waste loads and compositions
  • Boost methane yield and volatile solids reduction
  • Stabilize digestion during shock loads pr toxic events
  • Minimize foaming and scum formation
  • Improve sludge dewaterability, reducing disposal costs

Without strong microbial activity, digestion slows, gas yields drop, and energy recovery becomes uneconomical. We partner with etp stp plant manufacturers to integrate anaerobic digesters, gas handling, and CHP in new builds.

Turning wastewater into Energy: How it works
  1. Anaerobic Digestion + Biocultures

Our Anaerobio biocultures accelerate the breakdown of organics in wastewater and sludge, converting them into methane-rich biogas efficiently and consistently. For plants evaluating anaerobic bioculture price, we provide transparent quotations based on COD load, flow, dosing plan, and target methane yield. We are among reliable anaerobic bioculture suppliers offering consistent strains, QA/QC documentation, and startup support.

  1. Co-Digestion for More Gas

Feeding digesters with FOG (fats, oils, grease), food waste, or dairy residues alongside sludge boosts biogas yields significantly. Our targeted microbial blends handle these high-strength wastes without process instability, giving you more gas from the same infrastructure. Optimized inoculation and co‑digestion increase biogas production while improving digester stability and dewatering.

  1. Biogas Utilize Pathways
  • CHP (Combined Heat & Power) – Run engines on biogas to power blowers, pumps, and heat digesters, cutting energy bills.
  • Biomethane (RNG)-Upgrade biogas for grid injection or CNG vehicles, accessing renewable energy credits and new revenue streams.
  1. Beyond Biogas

Advanced microbial and electrochemical processes are enabling hydrogen production, while wastewater heat recovery systems are capturing thermal energy for building use.

The Business Case

Energy Savings: Reduce grid electricity dependence by up to 80-100% in optimized systems.

Revenue Generation: Sell excess power, biomethane, or renewable energy certificates.

Lower OPEX:  Minimize Sludge disposal costs through higher volatile solids destruction

Sustainability Goals: Lower greenhouse gas emissions and improve ESG scores.

A Practical Roadmap for ETP/STP Owners
  1. Assess your biogas potential — measure COD load and sludge availability.
  2. Strengthen your microbial engine — dose Anaerobio biocultures for faster, more stable digestion.
  3. Explore co-digestion — partner with food industries for high-energy wastes.
  4. Decide your offtake model — CHP for self-powering, or biomethane for revenue.
  5. Plan for future add-ons — hydrogen, nutrient recovery, and heat reuse.
Bottom Line

Wastewater isn’t waste — it’s renewable energy in disguise.
If you operate a biogas generator, gas cleaning (H2S/moisture) and steady feed improve uptime and efficiency. We collaborate with leading green energy companies in india to deliver waste‑to‑energy and biomethane projects. Our portfolio includes end‑to‑end green energy solutions from feasibility to commissioning and operator training.

With the right biocultures, you can turn your plant from an energy consumer into an energy producer, cut operating costs, and generate new revenue streams — all while meeting sustainability goals. Beyond energy recovery, our Bioremediation services address phenols, PAHs, sulfides, FOG, and color bodies.

Among specialized Bioculture companies in India, Team One Biotech focuses on robust consortia for tough industrial effluents.

Email: sales@teamonebiotech.com

Visit: www.teamonebiotech.com

Discover More on YouTube – Watch our latest insights & innovations!-

Connect with Us on LinkedIn – Stay updated with expert content & trends!

Treating Petroleum refinery effluent with high Sulfide concentration
Industrial Wastewater Treatment for Petroleum Refineries: High Sulfide Removal Using Biocultures

A reputed petroleum refinery approached us due to high concentration of sulfides in their effluents. They tried multiple solutions, including electroplating, RO, etc., but they were very cost-intensive. Also, they received multiple notices from the pollution control board and were paying heavy fines.

In such industries wastewater treatment methods like RO and chemical dosing prove unsustainable so we offered them biological wastewater treatment as an eco-friendly alternative.

To upgrade your facility’s efficiency with proven biological wastewater treatment methods, microbial solutions, and expert consultation, Contact Us.

 
ETP Details:
Parameter Value
Flow (current) 450 KLD
Flow (design) 450 KLD
Type of process Facultative
Capacity of UASB 1250 KL
Capacity of AT 450 KL
Retention Time 90.66 hours (combined)

Challenges:

Parameters (PPM) Avg. Inlet Avg. Outlet
COD 5500–9010 2200–4600
BOD 2500–5800 1300–3000
Sulfides 2000 2000
PAH 1250 680
 
Operational Challenges:
  • The primary treatment was working at 10% efficiency in terms of COD reduction
  • The biological treatment worked at an average of 50% efficiency in terms of COD reduction

They were struggling to control the higher Sulfide levels, and it was inducing shock loads as explained earlier. In this case, the Inadequate aeration in water treatment,   systems contributed to sulfide accumulation, highlighting the need for advanced ETP water treatment process design and management.

 
Tackling Sulfides in ETPs:

To tackle sulfides in ETP, the presence of SOBs or sulfide-oxidising bacteria is a must. The SOBs oxidize sulfides into sulfates. To prevent sulfate accumulation, SRBs or sulfur-reducing bacteria are required; however, SRBs are only effective in anaerobic systems.

Issues with Process:

The main issue with the process was that there was no provision of a separate aeration tank before UASB, where sulfides need to be oxidized into sulfates. This gap in the industrial wastewater treatment design reduced system effectiveness and highlighted the importance of using effective biocultures for wastewater treatment.

 
The Approach:

The industry partnered with us to commission their UASB and aeration tank with increased capacity and restart the plant at its full capacity in terms of hydraulic load.

We adopted a 3D approach:

  1. Research/Scrutiny:
  • Our team visited their facility to go through the process of the new ETP and to scrutinize the value-addition factors.
  1. Analysis:
  • We analyzed the 3-month cumulative data of their ETP to see trends in the inlet-outlet parameters’ variations and the permutation combinations related to it.
  1. Innovation:
  • After the research and analysis, our team curated customized products and their dosing schedules with formulation keeping in mind the plan of action to get the desired results.

This process is called bioaugmentation.
Our tailor-made microbial blends reflect Team One Biotech’s leadership among top biotech companies in India, offering scalable solutions based on site-specific microbial demand.

Desired Outcomes:

  1. Reduction in Sulfide levels in the final outlet
  2. Development of strong biology to withstand shock loads and prevent upsets
  3. Making ETP more efficient regarding COD/BOD and PAH degradation
  4. Reduction in FOG
  5. Improved microbial culture for wastewater treatment effectiveness under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions
 
Execution:

Products Used:

  • T1B Aerobio: Our aerobic bioculture for wastewater treatment consists of blends of several strains SOBs and facultative microorganisms, usually bacteria, along with key trace elements on a complex inert media. t1b-aerobio
  • T1B Anaerobio: Our anaerobic bioculture blend consists of SRBs and other anaerobic microbes that effectively reduce sulfates into H2S and enhance COD/BOD control. t1b-anaerobio

Plan of Action:

  1. A tank of 300 KL before UASB was converted into an aerobic tank, and T1B Aerobio with SOBs was dosed for sulfide oxidation.
  2. T1B Anaerobio was dosed in UASB for sulfate and COD reduction.
  3. The addition of T1B Aerobio was also done in the aeration tank after UASB every day.

This strategic integration of wastewater treatment methods significantly boosted operational stability and treatment consistency.

 
Results:
Parameters (PPM) Avg. Inlet Avg. Outlet (Secondary Clarifier)
COD 5500–9010 900–1300
BOD 2500–5800 350–750
Sulfides 2000 180
PAH 1250 220
 
Before & After Bioaugmentation:

Performance Highlights:
  • The COD/BOD degrading efficiency increased from 50% to 83%
  • Sulfide reduction was achieved up to 91%
  • PAH was also getting degraded up to 82.4%
  • MLSS: MLVSS ratio was optimized
  • Biomass in the ASP system displayed great stability even during shock load situations
  • Methane gas production increased by 12%

These results demonstrate the superior impact of our biological treatment approach when combined with engineered aeration in water treatment design.

To upgrade your facility’s efficiency with proven wastewater treatment methods, microbial solutions, and expert consultation, Contact Us.

???? Email: sales@teamonebiotech.com

???? Visit: www.teamonebiotech.com

???? Discover More on YouTube – Watch our latest insights & innovations!-

???? Connect with Us on LinkedIn – Stay updated with expert content & trends!

Scan the code